Solod – A Subset of Go That Translates to C

TheWiggles 83 points 20 comments April 07, 2026
github.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (10 comments)

Retr0id

I don't really "get" the sweet-spot being targeted here. You don't get channels, goroutines, or gc, so aside from syntax and spatial memory safety you're not really inheriting much from Go. There is also no pathway to integrate with existing Go libraries. Spatial memory safety is nice but it's the temporal safety that worries me most, in nontrivial C codebases.

tidwall

"To keep things simple, there are no channels, goroutines, closures, or generics." I wonder if it could be integrated with https://github.com/tidwall/neco , which has Go-like coroutines, channels, and synchronization methods.

MYEUHD

Related and currently on the front page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47627595

Onavo

Does it work with the preprocessor?

MegagramEnjoyer

This is a bit too barebones. At least bring goroutines dude

remywang

Anton also wrote the fantastic codapi [1] for embedding executable code snippets with wasm [1]: https://codapi.org/

ridiculous_fish

I was curious how defer is implemented. `defer` in Go is famously function-scoped, not lexically-scoped. This means that the number of actively-deferred statements is unbounded, which implies heap allocation. The answer is that Solod breaks with Go semantics here: it just makes defer block-scoped (and unavailable in for/if blocks, which I don't quite get). https://github.com/solod-dev/solod/blob/main/doc/spec.md#def...

0xmrpeter

The claim that no goroutines makes this pointless isn't quite right. Migrated 50 services off Docker Compose using Nomad and half of them had zero concurrency needs. A safe Go-syntax C target is actually useful for that layer.

numlock86

> So supports structs, methods, interfaces, slices, multiple returns, and defer. > To keep things simple, there are no channels, goroutines, closures, or generics. Sure, slices and multiple return values are nice, but it's not what makes Go good. When people think about Go they usually think about channels and goroutines. YMMV While I do kind of get what the appeal and target audience is supposed to be, I absolutely don't get why you'd choose a subset and still have it behave differently than the Go counterpart. For me that destroys the whole purpose of the project.

vaughan

We need this for TypeScript.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
3,752 stories · 35,056 chunks indexed