Show HN: For 10 World Cups, my model's 2 favorites had the champion every time
fabioricardo7
36 points
50 comments
July 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 51.9ms across 5,215 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Building watchable digital twins of 64 World Cup games rogerdickey · 18 pts · July 23, 2026 · 45% similar
- Show HN: Distill and serve models with frontier quality for half the cost SilenN · 42 pts · July 26, 2026 · 43% similar
- Show HN: I made a retirement simulator: 125 years of data, 25 countries nhootan · 15 pts · August 26, 2026 · 42% similar
- Choosing an AI model: one prompt, 11 models, different results toddmorey · 192 pts · August 13, 2026 · 42% similar
- Show HN: HN Hall of Fame – browse 3,100 legendary Hacker News links oyster143 · 187 pts · July 22, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (19 comments)
dwedge
!remindme tomorrow
mcphage
How does this paper not even mention the word "overfitting"?
dwedge
A good AI would calculate refereeing decisions and put Argentina at 100% unless England can pull off a miracle against FIFA today.
killingtime74
"They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time." - Brian Fantana, Anchorman
walthamstow
It's worth noting that there has only been 24 world cups
immighelper
Probably the human pseudonym of Paul the Octopus ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_the_Octopus ).
mikelward
> the model identifies Argentina (28.0%) and Spain (21.1%) as the leading championship candidates
derdi
> Applied prospectively to the in-progress 2026 World Cup from the Round of 32, the model identifies Argentina (28.0%) and Spain (21.1%) as the leading championship candidates. Seems weird to wait to run the "prospective" simulation until the World Cup is already in progress. Although it seems that the model also needs to use "the actual bracket and group-stage performance". So it's not prospective?
malthaus
now back your claim with money and bet accordingly on betting sites to see if you uncovered some actual alpha here
yardie
Does the model account for the blatant favouritism in the refs? We used to laugh about it before but as the cameras have gotten better it has become a lot more visible. And in this case, is turning the tournament into a bit of a joke. -- Egypt was robbed.
xiaodai
how statistic significant is it.
xiaodai
but does the model predict the right match up along way? if not it's just wrong wrong make a right
pestatije
and how many models did you model?
glenpierce
Survivor bias
amazingamazing
Why is the world cup so infrequent anyway? I assume to match olympics? Good models need a lot of data. Can you really be accurate with what, 30 data points, in which the team composition is basically reset each time?
bArray
I've been messing with the magic value weights, and it doesn't take too much to push them in any given direction. The TEAMS_2026 should really be taken with a pinch of salt.
bArray
I've updated the magic weights, and I too can get the result I want: WEIGHTS = { 'w_xg': 0.09, 'w_goals': -0.07, 'w_star': 0.018, 'w_value': 0.18, 'w_rank': 0.4, 'w_def': -0.12, 'xga_share': 0.85, 'w_gk': 0.0042 } $ python3 worldcup_model.py --sims 100000 2026 FIFA World Cup -- championship probabilities (100,000 simulations, from Round of 32) 1. England 11.7% * 2. France 10.0% * 3. Spain 9.3% * 4. Argentina 8.4% 5. Germany 8.1% It's coming home!
artur_makly
There is no MODEL for pure Argentine magic. vamos carajos! vamooooooooo con todo!!! Our time has come again.
pessimizer
Make sure your email is on file with every horrible news outlet in the world so they can write over 9000 stories about you before the next World Cup. Get a few nice glamorshots and make sure you have something else in the queue before then to plug during the interviews.