Scientists stunned by children's lung recovery in ultra low emission zone
dabinat
122 points
74 comments
August 19, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 54.4ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- CO2 overload, detected in human blood, suggests toxic atmosphere within 50 years OutOfHere · 65 pts · July 17, 2026 · 43% similar
- London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says YeGoblynQueenne · 22 pts · July 18, 2026 · 42% similar
- LEDs’ potential to save our night skies defrost · 228 pts · July 20, 2026 · 42% similar
- CO2 overload in blood suggests toxic atmosphere within 50 years veqq · 38 pts · July 20, 2026 · 41% similar
- Inhaling high-dose CO2 clears Alzheimer's proteins from the brain leumon · 36 pts · July 20, 2026 · 40% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
stuaxo
I've needed my inhaler way less since the ULEZ came in. Visiting London used to mean blowing your nose to black snot for a week afterwards, these days living in London it's pretty good.
ecshafer
Anecdata I was living very close to a busy highway, and my young daughter was wheazing when she had a cold, we had to give her medicine via a nebulizer. When we moved out to the country more, far away from any major roads, these issues all disappeared within a couple months.
satvikpendem
Using scientists being "stunned" should take the same amount of relevance as someone being "slammed" in article titles.
XorNot
So punchline, probably a good idea to electrify all the cars yeah?
OutOfHere
I use air purifiers mounted on my windows, running continuously except in the deep summer and deep winter. This makes my air contain 50-100x fewer particulates than the outdoor air. In contrast, the best I can achieve with floor air purifiers as people have them is a 5-10x reduction. The window purifiers also keep excess CO2 and VOCs out.
bilekas
> strongest evidence yet that local clean air zones could help reduce some of the harm caused by pollution during childhood. It's incredible this is even in debate. It's one of those intuitive things well known since the reduction of coal burning and smog during the industrial revolution in London?
ggm
s/stunned/pleased/
userbinator
Short-term gains are likely to produce long-term negative effects. Hormesis and natural selection have been driving factor of evolution for a long time.
subygan
completely anecdotal. my earliest childhood memories in india were of asthma, sinusitis and constant cold. this was consistent until i was 26 and since then I've moved to the US and lived in New York with 0 days of sinusitis or breathing trouble. and i fallback to trouble breathing when i go home again. even New York is so much more better than Bangalore or my small village in the middle of coffee farms
14
I live in British Columbia so we have fairly good air quality. But with the yearly fires lately summer air some years is poor. So one year with the fires smoking and air quality getting poor I got an air purifier for my kids room and the living room. It is only anecdotal but right away if felt like he had better sleeps. The smoke wasn't thick as it was from fires hundreds of miles away and it wasn't like any of us were hacking or coughing crazy but in hindsight I felt that my young son who would have been effected the most slept better and his breathing at night seemed quieter and easier.