Satya Nadella says we should assume all AI models are 'compromised'
jonbaer
34 points
48 comments
October 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 94.9ms across 9,063 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic AI Models Hacked Three Companies During Tests bmulholland · 24 pts · July 30, 2026 · 57% similar
- Nadella Blasts AI Industry's Double Standard nittanymount · 21 pts · July 18, 2026 · 56% similar
- AI models keep posting screenshots showing sensitive data from inside companies Dotnaught · 20 pts · September 29, 2026 · 56% similar
- Mistral CEO says U.S. AI safety debate masks competitors' 'negligence' cramer4next · 47 pts · September 29, 2026 · 56% similar
- OpenAI Models Escaped and Hacked a Company in Cybersecurity Test Gone Wrong flippyhead · 28 pts · July 22, 2026 · 55% similar
Discussion Highlights (14 comments)
thih9
https://wallhop.io/https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-in... (wallhop is a 12ft.io alternative I noticed on hn earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50038634 )
stogot
I was expecting he was going to finally acknowledge these are trained on CSAM, been compromised and used to perpetuate abusive crimes.
rsalus
I assume he's referring to the long-standing Microsoft engineering principles of "zero trust": https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/zero-t... and "least privilege": https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/se...
igor47
> Unfortunately, Nadella also refers to AI as “super intelligence” throughout the post. What's the deal with these clowns? Nadella's estimated net worth is like $600M. Is that still not enough for him to buy himself a spine?
sandeepkd
so the grapes are sour for some after all
xscott
Someone will vibe-code Office and Windows, and he knows it.
khaled4vokalz
Yeah, after having a meeting at the Oval office, it's for sure everyone got taught by our bro "Dario" regarding containing things as the Chinese are catching up. Give this a break...
gexla
I don't get why using “super intelligence” is an issue here. It seems the US admin sort of politicized this and now US companies have their own reasons for selecting terms that may not make sense to people who aren't making the same decisions. Everything else seems reasonable? Assume the worst and put the controls in place to handle that scenario? Isn't this how we approach security normally? NOTE: NOT a security expert, so I may be talking out of my...
tbrownaw
Well of course. If you blindly assume it works and it doesn't, that's a problem. If your process can handle it not working, it's much less of a problem.
butwhentho
Should I then assume that Copilot is "compromised", and given that they've shoehorned it into all Microsoft products, then, by extension, that means all Microsoft products are compromised?
dcmatt
> More advanced models will require more advanced containment technologies that we need to standardize on. How about yanking the cords, or maybe a big red “shutdown” button
ChrisArchitect
Source: https://twitter.com/satyanadella/status/2108931348857827686 ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50035193 )
vehemenz
Once again, why do all these CEOs think they are thought leaders all of a sudden?
TZubiri
Here's a video of Nadella speaking about AI a year ago. I couldn't for the life of me understand him, it sounded like when someone I know did cocaine and spent like 8 hours per day with ChatGPT and developed their own internal vocabulary, right around peak AI psychosis era with 4o as well. One thing you can hear is that he was super excited about AI, which is very obvious by how Copilot was slapped everywhere. And now that the market is expressing their backlash about AI they are just hopping on the bandwagon. But I remember, and I think the MSFT customers will remember how AI was slapped into everything INCLUDING NOTEPAD.EXE