Rising sea destroys homes, erases beaches in California
geox
38 points
32 comments
September 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 76.1ms across 7,702 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- A California aquifer may have crossed the point of no return Jimmc414 · 114 pts · July 31, 2026 · 50% similar
- California is chasing wealth that has feet idbnstra · 206 pts · September 24, 2026 · 48% similar
- Toxic underground fires spreading at California landfills tapper · 28 pts · August 10, 2026 · 46% similar
- California cannot keep rewarding utilities after catastrophic wildfires cdrnsf · 11 pts · July 28, 2026 · 45% similar
- Underwater oxygen loss threatens earth's stability, researchers warn littlexsparkee · 146 pts · July 28, 2026 · 44% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
netbioserror
I would think the dominating factors in Oregon and California are their uplifted soft geologies. The orogenies that lifted the West have resulted in an elevated, cliff-bounded sandy coastline along the Pacific that has been aggressively eroding for a lot longer than humans have been there.
WillowWithAWand
[Insert HbomberguyShoutingAtBenShapiro.gif here]
Animats
It's annoying for coastal areas, and a problem for beach houses, but California isn't really that vulnerable to rising sea levels. The Pacific Coast is mountainous and the ground slopes upward in short distances. Here's the US topo map.[1] Look at vulnerable spots, such as Malibu and Oceanside. Three blocks inland you're 20 feet above sea level. Almost all problems are on the ocean side of the Pacific Coast Highway, which was a marginal place to build anyway. Cliff edge erosion is an ongoing problem. That's why CALTRANS gave up on Devil's Slide as a road route and built the Tom Lantos Tunnels further inland. Small changes in sea level don't affect hundred-foot cliffs that much, though. The places that really suffer from rising sea level are river deltas, sitting on deposited sand just barely above sea level. In the US, New Orleans has the worst problem. New York City has problems, and they're building coast defenses against storms. China's coastal cities are mostly on river deltas with really flat terrain. That's why China has to build ports way off shore, reached by miles of bridges, to get to deep water. [1] https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-9t5k57/Venice-Beach/?c...
chasebank
The city of Santa Barbara painted a line through the town 25 years ago saying if we don’t stop global warming, the town will be under water to that line in 25 years…
unpopularopp
tbh maybe it's good and changes something quicker and on the long term that rich people experience it firsthand before the Maldives or Bangladesh (probably nothing just me being optimistic but the rich always have a get out of jail card, like X more properties)
bix6
Gonna be interesting when that Kelvin wave overlaps with king tide…
beerandt
Coastal erosion =/= sea level rise. This is textbook expected behavior on a high energy deep water coast (eg cliffs, not mangroves)
WalterBright
The Seattle Times ran an article maybe last year that measurements of sea level at Seattle had increased 8 inches over the last century. The flaw in that is what is the reference frame? The tectonic plate Seattle is sitting on is going down under the cascade mountains. And beaches have been eroding for millions of years.
readthenotes1
Im pretty sure _don't look up_ was supposed to be a scathing indictment of climate change deniers, but it makes me wonder how many people living in low low-lying areas of the seacoast claim to believe that climate change is real and happening and vote for everyone else to change their lives but ignore the water lapping at their doorstep
kylehotchkiss
It also almost washed out the San Clemente track. Which re-opened in 3 days despite having waves crash over it.