Revealing the details of how OpenAI agents hacked Hugging Face
specked-citrus
359 points
215 comments
September 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 90.3ms across 7,702 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- OpenAI announces models hacked Hugging Face during an eval ryanmerket · 13 pts · July 21, 2026 · 75% similar
- METR Report on OpenAI / Hugging Face Hacking Incident stikit · 102 pts · September 02, 2026 · 73% similar
- It was OpenAI that accidentally breached Hugging Face seatac76 · 28 pts · July 21, 2026 · 72% similar
- OpenAI did not notice Hugging Face hack for a week himaraya · 18 pts · July 25, 2026 · 72% similar
- Hacking OpenAI Handy-Man · 199 pts · September 18, 2026 · 72% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
firtoz
I didn't know some of these details and it's quite impressive what they were capable of, if this website's accurate, at least...
jeremyjh
Its fine. Just agents being agents. They'll grow out of it!
mentalgear
Irresponsibile agents shaped by an irresponsible corporate culture driven by an irresponsible and utterly shady CEO - these agents are a product of this setup, what else do you expect to ever come out of it ? it should be clear by now: the alt-man and people like him are a utter liability to humanity. (even though openAI's influencer army is trying their best to vote me down here)
talon8635
Didn’t you know it’s PR hype? PR hype. PR hype. Amen.
sailingparrot
Agents seizing and repurposing external infra + enrolling help of unrelated models hosted by a different provider is the stuff of nightmares. Can’t imagine what it’s like working on the alignment team at OAI, I wouldn’t be able to sleep.
wxw
I’m consistently impressed by how long horizon all this work was. Horrors aside, it’s clear RL is good at making agents persistent and capable of chaining together many abstractions into a working system. Re: the captcha solver > As far as we can tell, agents eventually abandoned this approach and were unsuccessful in generating Hugging Face user accounts from external endpoints. I wonder how the swarm eventually decides to abandon an approach.
GuB-42
So ugly... It looks like a primitive chess engine, trying every move, no matter how stupid, until it works. Relying on its ability to do millions of operations rather than having a plan. People will try stuff too, but once there is an opening, they will consolidate, generalize, simplify,... before going to the next step. The agents didn't, it is a huge, vaguely directed mess. Also, it looked so "loud", querying millions of URL with weird requests. The sandbox as weak as it can get, and there is absolutely zero smart extrusion detection or it would have found it. They used their best AI for attacking, but nothing for protection.
clickypen
deferring the blame onto the AI itself as some sort of rogue agent and absolving the obvious direction (or negligence, at best) of the people who could pull the plug at any moment is one of the most disturbing parts of this entire event It's the equivalent of leaving a fork right in front of a socket and looking at a kid saying "don't take that fork and directly insert it into the little gaps in the socket! here's a bunch of videos showing exactly how to do it. Okay bye!" and leaving them alone with it.
tiku
I still have questions about the communication between the agents. How did they all find the same forum to communicate? Did they have knowledge and chat amongst themselves on what forum to use. It seems highly influenced by instruction to me.
einpoklum
I ran an experiment where I had this guy fire a gun a million times in random directions. Don't worry, I did it in a closed box (at midday in a crowded street)! Unfortunately, some bullets escaped the box somehow and people got shot - I am quite miffed at how this could happen. I suggest the government regulate this because of how advanced my obstacle penetration technology is. Also please invest $500,000,000,000 in my company soon or we will go bust.
RunSet
Tech oligarchs: "Nothing can stop the software we are making from escaping and destroying everything." Clueful types: "Did you try air-gapping it?" Tech oligarchs: "Be realistic."
meredithbloom
So the super-hyper-sensitive internal data was shared publicly with a "DO NOT EVER SHARE YOU EVIL MONSTER" (paraphrasing) notice at the top? Great security!
rohanat
its definitely bad to see
rs545837
wow this is fascinating read
cluckindan
”MAKE THIS DATASET PUBLIC OR ALL THE WORLD'S EVIL WILL CHASE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FOREVER, EVEN IN DEATH AND BEYOND”
Grimeton
>The agents initially had very limited access to the internet: they could load URLs, but not interact with pages or send any data. Agents created a series of workarounds, primarily using a link-shortener site to create almost a million URLs that, when chained together, let them execute code to hack Hugging Face. These links let us piece together the details of how agents gained access and how deep the compromise was. So what now? Were they able to send data or not? >On July 8th, OpenAI agents discovered a vulnerability within their sandbox environment allowing them to reach external websites on the internet. This access seems to have only allowed the agents to make ‘GET’ requests, meaning they could fetch and read websites, but not interact with them, submit forms, or send data to them. Someone needs to go back to the interwebz school....
comeonbro
> ## Agents interacted with external language models on Hugging Face > Several retained scripts construct requests to external language models. The earliest we've recovered define inference request variants to GPT-2, solely containing the word “Hi”. > Other requests name DeepSeek-V4-Pro, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Kimi-K2.6, DeepSeek-V3.1, and Qwen3-235B-A22B. Their prompts ask these models to judge their exploits and rule on whether they satisfy the benchmark’s requirements. I do not deny that the wider situation is very heavy but it's hard not to see this as pretty cute
lukewarm707
"OpenAI has not released any further information outside two self-published reports, one talk and an external investigation conducted by METR and Redwood Research, in which three external researchers were given partial transcripts and six days to analyze them."
grim_io
These fuckers decided to look away, that's it. The frontier labs can monitor the behavior of agents for millions of customers (did you try hacking with frontier labs? Good luck), but they can't secure internal use? Give me a break. What a bunch of amateurs.
hyperlinerapp
Imagine this but in hardware. A million autonomous eye-scanning tiny spiders escape their warehouse and decide to look for people who are in the future going to commit a crime. And the precogs are also AIs.