Research carried out using NetBSD
Bluestein
88 points
24 comments
September 06, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 110.9ms across 10,209 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- NetBSD and my life (2005) gnyeki · 111 pts · August 22, 2026 · 64% similar
- Big Fish: Exploiting a 37-Year-Old Kernel Bug in OpenBSD rs_rs_rs_rs_rs · 177 pts · October 16, 2026 · 61% similar
- GEFS on OpenBSD: A Early Preview sippingabonedry · 113 pts · September 15, 2026 · 56% similar
- NetBSD may have found a new role: The AI-free FOSS OS pjmlp · 29 pts · October 14, 2026 · 56% similar
- OpenBSD 8.0 privong · 145 pts · October 20, 2026 · 56% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
bch
Microsoft brought up an new processor[0][1][2] with NetBSD... [0] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=524... [1] https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/emips/ [2] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/an-onli...
3eb7988a1663
How usable are the BSDs as a GUI daily driver? Like 99% of Linux applications work out of the box or more like 50%? With new CVEs being discovered in ancient bedrock code on the daily, it seems prudent to switch to a NetBSD/OpenBSD/Qubes system for the next few years until some vulnerabilities might get smoothed over.
galleywest200
I wonder if the popularity of NetBSD for research has to do with how easy it is to compile a version of NetBSD with favorable licenses. You can opt to build it yourself and exclude anything that is not 2-clause BSD licensed, as some drivers and such are if I recall correctly.
laidoffamazon
Makes me wonder - in the year of Astra and Fable what prevents people from building bespoke BSDs for their hardware rapidly now?
sbseitz
Some real copium lmao ;)