Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Uncertainty in LLMs
jonnonz
12 points
1 comment
July 07, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 446.6ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Can LLMs Beat Classical Hyperparameter Optimization Algorithms? galsapir · 109 pts · June 09, 2026 · 54% similar
- The case for zero-error horizons in trustworthy LLMs daigoba66 · 71 pts · April 02, 2026 · 54% similar
- A sleep-like consolidation mechanism for LLMs juxtapose · 195 pts · May 26, 2026 · 52% similar
- Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Back End Code Generation wek · 210 pts · May 24, 2026 · 51% similar
- Thoughts on LLMs – Psychological Complications cdrnsf · 11 pts · March 24, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
thx67
> Since monitoring task performance and adapting behavior accordingly are central to metacognition, we posit that mod- els capable of accurately judging their own performance are better positioned to improve it. We operationalize this idea via two novel mechanisms: reinforcement learning with metacognitive feedback (RLMF), a paradigm to refine completion rankings during preference optimization based on the quality of a model’s self- judgments of performance, and metacognitive data selection, which uses similar self-judgments to identify high-value training examples, outperforming naive active learning.