Qwen 3.6 is now much easier to run locally on your Mac, thanks to JetBrains
bundie
36 points
11 comments
August 24, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 100.4ms across 4,281 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Fixed three bugs that made Qwen3.5-122B a daily driver on Mac Studio marzukia · 25 pts · July 11, 2026 · 66% similar
- Qwen 3.8 Max linzhangrun · 26 pts · July 19, 2026 · 61% similar
- Qwen 3.8 nh43215rgb · 836 pts · July 19, 2026 · 59% similar
- Qwen 3.8 27B is excellent, but it defaults to overthinking things bilsbie · 258 pts · August 16, 2026 · 57% similar
- Qwen 3.8 Max Preview lebovic · 217 pts · July 19, 2026 · 57% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
bellowsgulch
Uh... brew install llama.cpp llama serve -hf unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_M open http://127.0.0.1:8080
danw1979
How is this easier than using lmstudio or omlx or whatever your favourite runtime is ? It’s maybe a bit interesting that Jetbrains are making moves to integrate with local models more closely, but I think claiming this is “easier” is incorrect for most users.
nateb2022
Curious why they're using 3.6-27B and not 3.8-27B which is competitive with Opus 4.6 ( https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B )
coder-pm
Anything good to run on Mac M5 Max with 48GB? is this even worth trying? so far I found the responses so slow compared to the paid subscriptions...
bellowsgulch
It seems to me that Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is still the local LLM leader, because 27B in either of the latest releases is just too slow to be usable compared to OpenCode Zen free models, or OpenRouter free models. Sad a Qwen3.8-35B-A3B model wasn't released. Also, I think this is just an ad.
karmakaze
Why are they tying the client with the AI model instead of using OpenAI or another popular http format? Running llama.cpp locally is about the right level of complexity for most doing local AI.