Pushed by Trump policies, top U.S. battery scientist is moving to Singapore
Metacelsus
64 points
36 comments
May 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 80.1ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Trump Slashed Science Funding. Now the U.S. Could Face a Costly Brain Drain JumpCrisscross · 20 pts · April 05, 2026 · 50% similar
- U.S. science agency moves to restrict foreign scientists from its labs JeanKage · 348 pts · March 02, 2026 · 49% similar
- Cheap Batteries Are Taking over the Power Grids epistasis · 14 pts · April 20, 2026 · 48% similar
- Europe to burned American scientists: We'll take you in (2025) vrganj · 23 pts · April 26, 2026 · 47% similar
- Trump Fires the National Science Board aaronbrethorst · 24 pts · April 25, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
mbeavitt
I wonder - everyone keeps talking about brain drain and how impactful it is, but is it quantifiable?
embedding-shape
> I was really searching for a position that would let me do my work, which is to translate the fundamental science into industry impact. I’ve been entrusted with a very high position in my home country, but at the same time, I’m seriously concerned that, if I were asked by the [U.S.] Department of War to perform certain tasks, I probably won’t be able to do it. Things like [making better batteries for] drones, or humanoids for war fighting. Maybe they already have their own expertise. But I just don’t want to risk it. > I also think it’s important that I maintain my reputation as someone who’s always building things, not destroying things. So, I decided it’s probably better for somebody else to [direct the DOE hub]. Really inspiring and hearth-warming to see a scientist to consider the full impact of their work, in such a direct way, and then not only thinking these things, but also acting on them to ensure she feels right with what she does. We really need more of these types of people in the world :)
xtiansimon
> “I’ve always been an internationalist,” says Meng, who became a Singapore citizen in 2004, “and I think that…” Choices and decisions. And what of the scientific community in the US who don’t have ties abroad? Who don’t choose to leave the country? If the government isn’t funding research, and a university position is not open, then you have to turn to industry. And if that doesn’t turn up, then you’re the most overqualified… librarian? I’m thinking about the more diffused pattern of students with the aptitude and disposition for science going into industry. Is this the environment which drives more manufacturing in the US? Is this the vision the administration is chasing? (If you look past the racism and corruption, and presume there is an economic outcome the president and all of the republican congress appears to support him for?)
jaybrendansmith
Completely predictable. Science will leave these shores, either due to lack of funding, threat, or ideological disagreement. The amazing post-WWII economy will become stagnant, then start to fail, just like an engine that is starved of oxygen it will begin to sputter and choke. And everybody will be shocked, and try to assert control to change the behavior, which will work briefly then make it worse. We can only hope that no good alternative will exist, so that the gains by the rest of the world are disperse enough to allow the US to recover if the current oligarchy is overthrown politically.