Prospero: A new coding harness for a more civilized age
fovc
183 points
121 comments
October 31, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 290.1ms across 11,194 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Nine coding harnesses vs. your laptop nasutton12 · 40 pts · September 10, 2026 · 61% similar
- If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse? pchm · 674 pts · July 24, 2026 · 54% similar
- Old and new apps, via modern coding agents subset · 425 pts · July 12, 2026 · 53% similar
- The Hacker's Renaissance (2025) yu3zhou4 · 120 pts · August 09, 2026 · 52% similar
- Harness Engineering handfuloflight · 55 pts · July 18, 2026 · 52% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
BewareTheYiga
I like how this is laid out. Will have to give it a try.
thehamkercat
So much efficient use of space though, would love to have this UI on top of opencode/codex App-server protocol: https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/app-server Opencode: https://opencode.ai/docs/server/
eric15342335
How does this compare with Zed though?
keepo404
Looks like shit and part with professional edition killed me. Bro are we in 2000?
devmor
What a beautiful and space efficient UI. I love Dear ImGUI and the people that build interfaces with it. Reading through the whole post, this sounds like an thoughtfully and intentionally designed product. One with strong opinions and the developer’s real lessons behind it. In the current era of slopware- especially around AI tooling - this is giving me damn near an emotional reaction. I am happy to see this.
lifeisloving
>Prospero is a native GUI application for Windows, macOS, and Linux But right above this statement, on the Professional Edition purchase page, it says its only for Windows and Mac..
post-it
> (You can’t use your Claude subscription.) How come?
smashed
First time I see a software licensed with the Unlicense. I thought it meant the license was missing on GitHub but, no, it's an actual license called the Unlicense. But then there is the Community and Pro edition so which is which on GitHub? Is the pro version hidden somewhere? Plus a c++ code base in 2026. I think modern c++ can be made quite safe but I need some claims that it's taken seriously which I don't see. I'm confused. edit: I'm getting down voted here and no-one is telling me what I said wrong. These are my first impressions on the project. I think it's valuable feedback. Please reply and explain why I'm wrong instead of just down voting.
OleksandrC
If you're looking for an agent implementation that is light on resources, but prefer to work in a terminal, consider also hax ( https://usehax.dev/ ). Less than 2 MB fully static Linux binary, few MBs of RAM use in runtime. Works great with local models also (auto-detects config from running llama-server), besides the usual cloud providers.
bensyverson
There are so many cool harnesses I could use if I didn't have an outrageously subsidized Claude subscription
khalic
magnus breaths heavily
zzunkie
A year ago I never felt my MacBook was short on resources, but these days I find myself thinking a lot about the performance of harnesses and agent tools.
brainless
Nice to see a gui coding agent. I use tui agents all the time but I am building a gui one. I use Claude Code, Codex, opencode and a couple other but I do not like the DX/UX. I often want click a part of the wall of text (from agent) and search for related text, open them up on the side or so. I want to open a linked file. I want to answer multiple questions in an async manner, even come back and continue answering the next day. There are many prompt level features I want too - orchestrate with subagents, but only the tasks I select - how do I select when there is no checkbox. Or maybe delegate a subagent to dig into (read only) one portion of the chat response. Maybe codify (write) only one task in a list of tasks. So many many other small things. As a full-time user of coding agents, the TUI barely works for me. I think splitting text, searching in text, merging text are more important in agent driven development than ever before. It is all text, all the way. This is what I am building myself, with my own gui framework.
brador
Prospero was the original code name for the ps5 console that is recently jailbroken. That’s why you’re seeing a lot of other unrelated projects with this name too.
gapo
As a counterpoint to a lot of the comments on this now portraying this as dated and questioning the stack behind - this is has the guts of great enterprise level software. Once you’ve serious data being thrown at something built on JS and run into OOMs, that’s when good old C(rust in the future maybe) stack shows these up. Love to see such a strong tasteful take on software heralding back to the age of solid desktop apps.
stickfigure
There are so many Prospero s already. Why choose a name that is so heavily overloaded?
keyle
Many make their own harness today anyway... I did mine as well and that takes 4% the resources of opencode and in a similar tui style. I think it's great and everyone should make their own.
julesrms
Great to see what you're doing there, but speaking as a 30-year hardcore C++ veteran (to the extent of creating my own C++ GUI framework: https://juce.com )... When I was writing a code agent ( https://github.com/juggler-ai/juggler ), there's no way I'd have used C++ for an agent GUI! Agent UIs are all markdown, HTML, big scrolling lists, text flow, unicode chars, and all the other stuff that C++ frameworks are terrible at, but which is a doddle in HTML/CSS/JS.. You are a brave man!
Rabbit504030201
I'd really like to see a comprehensive test of all of those 100s of agentic harnesses. Get a billionaire to give a million to crunch through them all within a week or so.
neuroelectron
JavaScript is just about the worst thing ever and why would you use that as middleware for anything if you didn't have to? I mean, I get using Visual Studio Code, if you don't care about your business processes, intellectual property or engineers and are just outsourcing everything, but imagine actually trusting it for your coding stack like some kind of middle manager who only cares about cutting costs to the bone? Or like, you're riding the AI bubble and want to release some minimal viable product as fast as possible, but it's 2026 now. Covid was 6 years ago.