Privacy isn't dead: it's just that tech companies have made it inconvenient
latein
33 points
5 comments
June 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 102.2ms across 9,294 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- "Privacy. That's iPhone." – and Other Things That Need an Asterisk upofadown · 12 pts · April 04, 2026 · 51% similar
- Chat Control: EU Parliament said no to Big Tech mass surveillance of your chats iamnothere · 12 pts · March 15, 2026 · 49% similar
- Stop big tech from making users behave in ways they don't want to andsoitis · 260 pts · May 04, 2026 · 49% similar
- The old world of tech is dying and the new cannot be born speckx · 140 pts · May 15, 2026 · 49% similar
- How Big Tech wrote secrecy into EU law to hide data centres' environmental toll cyberlimerence · 179 pts · April 17, 2026 · 48% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
casey2
Tech companies made it "inconvenient" by making worthless data worth something. The only reliable way to get companies to stop stealing this data is to put a price on it. Data Trusts & Fines are a poor and arbitrary way of accomplishing what should be a market function and criminal punishment for theft. Every request has an associated cost, this will lead to a race to the top for valuable users. While good websites will push requests costs into the negatives. It will happen sooner than you think, user data will creep towards tens of thousands per person. A situation where yearly data is worth more than their yearly take home is unsustainable. That's the Data Dividend. Bringing it back to the article, very few sane people are going to forgo tens of thousands of dollars for their search history, you are going to have to choose what's more valuable to you for each line item.