Perfect randomness realised for the first time
wjSgoWPm5bWAhXB
14 points
2 comments
June 01, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 656.3ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Myths about /dev/urandom (2014) signa11 · 86 pts · May 14, 2026 · 48% similar
- Correlated randomness in Slay the Spire 2 rdmuser · 288 pts · June 16, 2026 · 46% similar
- Particles seen emerging from empty space for first time naves · 12 pts · April 10, 2026 · 45% similar
- Connections in Math: the two kinds of random pcael · 32 pts · July 05, 2026 · 44% similar
- Seven Perfect Shuffles Randomize a Deck of Cards. But How Many Sloppy Ones? layer8 · 85 pts · June 18, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
ElectronCharge
This seems like a ton of hype for a marginal (if that) improvement over existing art. We've had "truly random" numbers for a long time, starting with those based on radioactive decay. Current hardware RNGs already take advantage of provably random physical processes. Intel's RDRAND implementation is one good example. Yes, it is probably not a "perfect" source of randomness, though one can always take other sources of entropy and mix further. Doing so will always move the output towards a more random state. I find it unlikely in the extreme that some future tech will be able to "predict" values from such a random stream (like you could with a PRNG given the seed). In other words, your cyphertext based on a RDRAND+ generated one time pad is safe for eternity, unless the pad is compromised.
AlotOfReading
What an awful university press release. "Randomness amplification" is just the old concept of a randomness extractor with quantum tacked on. It's a neat demo at best.