People with cancer / HIV could lose Medicaid under new work rules, advocates say
littlexsparkee
28 points
7 comments
June 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 115.0ms across 10,324 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Aids Creeps Back in Parts of Zambia, a Year After U.S. Cuts to HIV Assistance susiecambria · 52 pts · May 09, 2026 · 48% similar
- Workers at top US low-wage firms rely on public assistance, report says i7l · 31 pts · March 04, 2026 · 45% similar
- The US slashed research for cancer, Alzheimer's, mental health – and more epistasis · 55 pts · March 13, 2026 · 45% similar
- Autism-Therapy Firm That Was Paid $340k per Patient Is Barred from Medicaid JumpCrisscross · 22 pts · March 26, 2026 · 44% similar
- "Not Medically Necessary": Helping America's Health Insurers Deny Coverage ceejayoz · 188 pts · May 13, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
WarOnPrivacy
The strict Medicaid work rules that the White House released this week are likely to put ongoing treatments in jeopardy. States must put the work requirements into effect by January 1. States must "make the changes, test the changes to make sure they're not going to break the system, and then go live," "It takes states literally months — usually years — to make the types of changes to their systems that they needed to make for this new rule," The nearly 400-page interim final rule released Monday makes that process even harder. [During the previous] months, federal officials met with states informally and states understood that people with conditions where continuous health insurance coverage was really important would be exempt. "What the [new] rule says, as published, is that that's actually not enough," "The condition or the disease needs to be actively interfering with your ability to work. So people with early stage cancer who are in radiation treatment but still have the capacity to work, or people who have HIV but can still technically work, are not exempted from the work requirement." Dr Oz pitched this as "a path to prosperity"
susiecambria
I've been involved in social services public policy since 1997 and this one of the meanest, hateful, despicable sets of rulemaking I have ever seen. It's almost as though the president and his team hate poor people. Or maybe that it's that they are dismissive of poor people. I can't do anything to change the rules right now, but I can and will engage in a ton of GOTV work for elections this year.