Peer-reviewed study of 443,000 Backblaze drives ranks HGST most reliable
sbulaev
21 points
4 comments
August 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 44.6ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Ask HN: Is there a website that tracks excessive writes to SSDs in OS/app betas? amichail · 29 pts · July 23, 2026 · 39% similar
- GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend LabsLucas · 12 pts · July 15, 2026 · 38% similar
- Benchmarking 15 “E-Waste” GPUs with Modern Workloads eso_logic · 123 pts · July 13, 2026 · 38% similar
- Geekbench 7 ilreb · 56 pts · July 23, 2026 · 37% similar
- Memory prices climb 500% in 12 months, up to 10x the lowest ever tracked prices haunter · 100 pts · August 17, 2026 · 37% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
toomuchtodo
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11458693/
cyanydeez
Can you imagine if they put this much work into fixing their billing system?
ShinyLeftPad
I spent hours pouring over their tables previously and it's still somewhat random depending on your capacity, batch and such... Like, I recall seeing how HGST failed much less for some years but then other drives of similar capacity in the setup were years older (way longer in use) so i would pay attention to specifics
systemswizard
It’s a shame WD acquired them and killed the brand in 2018. Some of the best spinning rust drive I’ve ever used