Peer-reviewed study of 443,000 Backblaze drives ranks HGST most reliable
sbulaev
21 points
4 comments
August 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 207.6ms across 8,687 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Backblaze drive stats for Q2 2026 HieronymusBosch · 145 pts · September 29, 2026 · 53% similar
- High-mileage electric cars are more reliable than petrol ones, study finds theanonymousone · 12 pts · September 22, 2026 · 44% similar
- A 12TB Steam “teraleak” spills more than a decade of lost PC gaming history WithinReason · 371 pts · August 31, 2026 · 39% similar
- Ask HN: Is there a website that tracks excessive writes to SSDs in OS/app betas? amichail · 29 pts · July 23, 2026 · 39% similar
- Show HN: We Beat MLPerf: Modern Storage for KV Offload and LLM Training arnav__1 · 35 pts · September 05, 2026 · 39% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
toomuchtodo
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11458693/
cyanydeez
Can you imagine if they put this much work into fixing their billing system?
ShinyLeftPad
I spent hours pouring over their tables previously and it's still somewhat random depending on your capacity, batch and such... Like, I recall seeing how HGST failed much less for some years but then other drives of similar capacity in the setup were years older (way longer in use) so i would pay attention to specifics
systemswizard
It’s a shame WD acquired them and killed the brand in 2018. Some of the best spinning rust drive I’ve ever used