PCI DSS DMARC Requirement: What Section 5.4.1 Requires
meysamazad
12 points
6 comments
July 24, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 24.6ms across 2,592 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- DMARC has been public since 2012 but most company domains still don't enforce it adulion · 182 pts · July 28, 2026 · 56% similar
- The growing threat of Docusign phishing attacks (2024) saikatsg · 14 pts · July 29, 2026 · 43% similar
- RFC 8890 – The Internet is for End Users (2020) notarobot123 · 121 pts · July 30, 2026 · 41% similar
- The State of MCP Security [pdf] mavzer · 26 pts · July 12, 2026 · 39% similar
- Every .ru Domain Now Needs Government ID speckx · 23 pts · July 22, 2026 · 37% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
john_strinlai
this article takes more time to read than dmarc takes to implement
CodesInChaos
> The best practice is a policy banning PAN over email, instant messaging, SMS, and chat entirely. Sounds silly to me. A PAN should never even touch an employee's computer.
tptacek
Kind of a weird post, since it acknowledges in the first 1/3rd that you don't need DMARC for PCI compliance.
fragmede
two words: compensating control. (But also setup dmarc)
yonatan8070
Took me too long to realize this has nothing to do with the Peripheral Component Interconnect or Direct Memory Access