PC Gamer recommends RSS readers in a 37mb article that just keeps downloading
JumpCrisscross
462 points
231 comments
March 22, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 46.7ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Show HN: Sprinklz.io – An RSS reader with powerful algorithmic controls sammy0910 · 12 pts · March 16, 2026 · 45% similar
- The death of social media is the renaissance of RSS (2025) jruohonen · 55 pts · March 09, 2026 · 44% similar
- The View from RSS Curiositry · 101 pts · March 04, 2026 · 44% similar
- Netscape News Feed Straight Out of the Late 00s mistyvales · 108 pts · March 29, 2026 · 44% similar
- Show HN: I built a tool that watches webpages and exposes changes as RSS vkuprin · 213 pts · March 11, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
goldenarm
I'm trying to migrate to 100% RSS right now, to avoid the hateful algorithmic editorialization of modern social media. And I'm shocked that almost no paid media provides full articles in RSS anymore, and force me to navigate their 37MB pages with popups all over the place. Has anyone found a solution against that ? Edit : Sorry I'm asking specifically about paywalled stuff
Blikkentrekker
Well, it's otherwise “free” to read the article so I guess this is how one “pays” in the end. I wonder how this works on mobile data though which is significantlym more expensive than home network data.
MBCook
The title buried the lede. > In the five minutes since I started writing this post the website has downloaded almost half a gigabyte of new ads. I’m guessing this is due to autoplaying videos. *500 MB* in 5 minutes. 37 MB is petite compared to that.
simonw
This is so upsetting. No wonder people spend more time in mobile apps than they do using the mobile web - the default web experience on so many sites is terrible .
m463
this just reminds me of... - watching "normal" cable tv - listening to "normal" fm radio - shopping on amazon (sponsored... everything)
notepad0x90
we need some sort of a universal crowd-sourced site rating system. Things like user experience, scamminess, user-hostility, site ownership-affiliations,etc.. all opt-in by users of course, you setup the criteria that is important to you and the browser displays different ratings or blocks certain sites (like scammy/fraudulent ones) out right. The reputation providers would also be selectable like search engines. I'd imagine there would be crowdsourced lists of all sorts. If you have older pepople struggling with cognition for example, this would be a good way to limit their exposure to scams. But commercial sites like this could also be rated as a privacy risk for the intense ad capitalism, or a 'bloat' to tell users it will slow down their computer by visiting the site. You could set it up so that when certain categories and ratings are met, the browser warns you before you could navigate to it. Another idea is to have this same system include alternative suggestions. For example, if a site has age verification, you would be able to setup your browser so that it warns you when you visit sites of that nature, listing alternatives recommended by the list maintainer, for whatever that site provides.
WarOnPrivacy
In Firefox + Unlock Origin: Downloads 5.6MB and then stops loading. Scrolling to the bottom of the page added 3MB of images and then stopped loading.
kelvinjps10
The person who wrote the article and the people in charge of the site are different.
WarmWash
Imagine trying to run an ad supported business to a bunch of people who are avid proponents of ad blocking. Also, thank you to the six people who download those 500MB to keep the site alive for the rest of us.
KostblLb
it's relatively easy for an ai to write such an article now, just open all websites and gather metrics while crawling...
userbinator
To use a good point of reference that I've seen others also start using lately, an installation of Windows 95 is roughly 40MB, so in loading that page you've downloaded approximately one Windows 95 installation. Then another 10+ times with the 500MB more that came after.
valicord
I hate ads as much as anyone, but the OP article would be more convincing if it didn't itself include 6MB worth of screenshots.
umarcyber
This was the exact motivation that led me to develop my own news feed for a vulnerability dashboard I'm working on. I would wait for my NVD API calls to finish by scrolling tech sites but was always inundated by ads...
elorant
Thank God for uMatrix. Seriously, I don't know how I lived without that thing. Load times on everything are at least 30% faster.
jdangu
To measure network load, open dev tools, uncheck "disable caches" then clear your browser cache then load the page. Screenshot indicates network cache is disabled so the stated number is inflated.
djoldman
I can't recommend enough limiting JS to an allowlist. By default, I browse without JS. If I get to a website that I want to explore that requires JS, I turn it on with one click: https://github.com/maximelebreton/quick-javascript-switcher
mnkyprskbd
At this point, if you browse the internet without an adblock; it is on YOU.
touwer
Even more embarassing is that the article adds really nothing to whatever was written before about rss. Probably gobbled up by AI
dailyforge
wtf is this tittle
Venn1
It's 3.60 MB with NoScript enabled.