Pangram Image 1.0

gmays 85 points 38 comments November 05, 2026
www.pangram.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (11 comments)

my002

People often shit on AI detectors but Pangram's text AI detection has been very good, IME. Not perfect, but good enough to be useful in most circumstances.

xnx

I'm very skeptical of AI detection and watermarking for text (especially short passages), but AI detection for images and videos seems much more plausible (for now at least). I would love if Meta licensed this tech to use for everything on Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp. Including ads!

74948494i4

What’s the use case for these things?

alkonaut

Can’t these detectors be used in the training loop of models?

paulpauper

just compress it? lossy should fool detection

hex4def6

At least on gemini generated images vs real ones, it works surprisingly well. Taking a photo of an AI generated image on my grubby laptop screen with my phone, moire and all, still got detected. So the signal it's using is pretty robust.

leothetechguy

Awesome research like this restores my faith in humanity.

sean_pedersen

An ill advised undertaking IMO: Any attempt to build AI generated content detection systems is flawed, since the outputs of such a system may be used to train an even better fake data generator. This leads to an equilibrium state of digital uncertainty: nothing in the digital realm can be deemed as real anymore - only as digital.

Trung0246

Interesting, it detected NovelAI stuff now. Looks like one can easily defeat it by having pixel-level modifications to make AI images to have characteristics of digital brush strokes and reducing "noise" in output. At least in my case for anime stuff.

nwhnwh

The cookie modal is disgusting... It takes a few moments to realize that if you only want the necessary ones, you need to close the modal as the existing action button is for allowing everything.

raincole

From my test it works surprisingly well. I have a digital painting that is only posted very recently (therefore not in the training set). I asked GPT, Gemini and Riverflow to generate images in the same style, and use SD to add noises to remove SynthID. Pangram gave correct results for all of them (the original one is No AI; all the others are Likely AI).

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
11,756 stories · 111,091 chunks indexed