Palantir to be granted "unlimited access" to UK NHS patient data
ck2
79 points
13 comments
May 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 79.2ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- NHS to grant Palantir contractors unlimited access to patient data macleginn · 13 pts · May 11, 2026 · 90% similar
- Palantir's access to identifiable NHS England patient data 'dangerous', MPs say chrisjj · 14 pts · May 11, 2026 · 81% similar
- Palantir extends reach into British state as gets access to sensitive FCA data chrisjj · 184 pts · March 22, 2026 · 77% similar
- New York City hospitals drop Palantir as controversial AI firm expands in UK chrisjj · 283 pts · March 26, 2026 · 71% similar
- Palantir has hired more than 30 senior UK Government officials Symbiote · 190 pts · May 15, 2026 · 69% similar
Discussion Highlights (11 comments)
repelsteeltje
> While broad access was originally intended only for NHSE employees with security clearance, the FT reported that the briefing noted that external workers had requested the same permissions “as it is too inconvenient to apply for all of the necessary individual CDAs”. Let's get rid of those pesky ACLs. Trust us, we know what we're doing.
t0mpr1c3
Nothing to see here. Internal controls are working as they should. Everything is fine.
bobsoap
This is why blind trust in any kind of entity governing your most sensitive data is misplaced. Laws and policy can be changed. Your identity cannot.
trolleski
UK is done. :(
ionwake
Weird story. A few years ago, some UK doctors were warning civilians to request to their Doctor to "NOT be included in shareable data" for this reason. That in itself was weird. Why would I have to ask for this? So I did, only for the doctor - a normal english doctor in a nice place, to turn to me and say " I can, but you are either 'on the team' or you are not " I was confused and I just went " I just rather my health data wasnt shared ". The point isnt that at one point it was possible to request this, or that doctors "leaked that you could", or that finally Palantir finally got access - my point is, if you think about it, some random Doctor thought it was politically incorrect for me to request privacy from possible future sharing of private patient data with corporate interests. I cant think of any possible benefit or reason he could have had other than some authority, perhaps a gov department, or news article somehow conveyed that it was "good". If most of the upper middle class think like this is, well then we shouldn't be surprised it got shared with Palantir. In my later years I just think, it is weird how different people are. So no I dont think this is just idiocy or naughtiness, most people are just rather perhaps ignorant. As always though I dont know, you tell me.
solumunus
I’m just totally black pilled on politics at this point. There’s just no hope.
slartybartfast6
NHS data opt out https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-data-opt-out
Traubenfuchs
This is high treason.
lschueller
I'm wondering how this works in accordance to gdpr, whichh has explicit guidelines for how to process healthcare related data. This seems conflicting in different ways.
stuaxo
A cynic would put this together with the plan to close all the NHSs source code: since the public wouldn't like further Palentir integration + be able to see it happening.
brokenmachine
Nothing to see here. Move along citizen, before I look into your file.