Palantir CEO Makes Confession on Disrupting Democratic Power
mindracer
90 points
21 comments
March 13, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 91.0ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Alex Karp: "People are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs" DGAP · 16 pts · March 12, 2026 · 70% similar
- Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys pavel_lishin · 815 pts · April 23, 2026 · 61% similar
- Palantir posts mini-manifesto denouncing inclusivity and 'regressive' cultures benwerd · 21 pts · April 19, 2026 · 59% similar
- Palantir turns poisonous on the campaign trail KnuthIsGod · 23 pts · March 24, 2026 · 58% similar
- Palantir manifesto – 'ramblings of a supervillain' amid UK contract fears mindracer · 15 pts · April 21, 2026 · 58% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
ZeroGravitas
> If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best college educated woman, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." -- LBJ remixed by AI
amadeuspagel
I'm not sure why I clicked on this article. I admit I expected something misleading, but at least about democratic as in "democratically elected". But this isn't even about "disrupting" the power of the democratic party, but rather about changing the relative value of different types of work, increasing that of blue collar work and lowering that of white collar work. The quiet part out loud, indeed.
0xDEFACED
does anyone have a link to the full news segment? it's not clear to me from the clip in the link that he's talking about Palantir; he makes multiple references to "this technology" without ever clarifying what "this" is. sounds to me like he's talking more about AI disruption at large
SilverBirch
I'm always a little surprised at how these Tech CEOs are willing to go on TV and just spout nonsense. Firstly, 40% of college educated white women voted for Trump at the last election. Secondly, isn't the entire theory of Trump's support amongst working class voters an appeal to economic populism due to an erosion of their economic position? Aren't you literally describing a process that last time lead to a massive political shift in favour of those who were negatively economically impacted? Oh and you think all the white collar workers are going to lose their jobs, but you don't think that's just directly going to cause a recession that wipes out blue collar republican jobs? It's difficult to (a) see how he can say this having given any real thought at all and (b) understand why he's going to on news interviews and winging it.