Our response to the US ban on Fable 5 and Mythos 5
ubutler
67 points
13 comments
June 13, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 113.3ms across 10,324 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Statement on US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 Dylan1312 · 1713 pts · June 13, 2026 · 82% similar
- As a result of a US Government directive, we are suspending access to Fable 5 plonkus · 88 pts · June 13, 2026 · 69% similar
- We've suspended access to Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5 jesse_dot_id · 246 pts · June 13, 2026 · 59% similar
- Mythos/Fable intentionally hinders requests involving AI Research Development behnamoh · 13 pts · June 09, 2026 · 54% similar
- Claude Fable 5 Philpax · 2005 pts · June 09, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
thunderbong
> ... this reality only further cements our position that frontier artificial intelligence ought to be accessible to everyone, rather than concentrated in the hands of a select few frontier labs, ourselves included. > To that end, every single model we’ve released has, from day one, been available for air-gapped self-hosting. We have no plans on changing that. In fact, we’ve doubled down on AI sovereignty, ... Extremely commendable.
dakolli
If I found out my lawyer was using an LLM, I would fire them immediately. Why is everyone using this slop. An LLM can't even center a fkin div reliably.
mnkv
Sounds nice except that these are 1 very small scale model, 1 reranker, and 1 embedding model that are far from frontier LLM level. And they're not open sourced. As much as I agree with the message, this reads like marketing copy trying to make a big deal out of a tiny model being hosted privately.
wg0
What if there's export control order for AWS services one day? Or cloud services in general?
feverzsj
At least, there'll be less slops on internet.