One person can now be a quorum at the SEC

mooreds 101 points 56 comments October 05, 2026
www.ft.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (11 comments)

djoldman

"This rule is effective on October 2, 2026." https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/10/02/2026-20...

skinfaxi

The key change seems to be innocuous: > The Commission is modifying 17 CFR 200.41, which establishes the Commission's quorum requirement. Three commissioners will continue to constitute a quorum of the Commission, with two important exceptions. First, consistent with the current rule, if the number of commissioners in office is two or one, that number is sufficient for a quorum. Second, if the number of commissioners in office minus the number disqualified from consideration with respect to a matter is two or one, then that number of commissioners constitutes a quorum for purposes of that matter.

java-man

Corruption is so much easier now!

tpurves

I met Paul Atkins, around this time last year. One of his biggest problems (like anyone running a federal department) was that he's not allowed to hire or increase his budget, yet the demand for work that needs SEC attention is not going down. And that's after his dept, and all others, were required to perform layoffs under DOGE.

advisedwang

The rule: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/10/02/2026-20... Extremely cheeky to skip out on APA rulemaking requirements

gortok

We are sitting in an uncanny valley regarding law. Once independent agencies are no longer independent, partly due to the expansion of the unitary executive viewpoint in both the Supreme Court and the current executive branch, and the rather obsequious Congress we have that instead of being “jealous to protect its power” is kowtowing to anything the Trump administration wants. The supreme courts ruling on presidential immunity, chevron deference, and the dismantling of the ideas of an independent agency have all come together to create a dangerous situation for all of us. The Supreme Court, whether because the of their own alignment with partisanship or some other more nefarious reason, have gutted the idea of an independent agency (except for the Federal Reserve, which is special, but not for any legal reason, but rather because even conservative SCOTUS is not willing to risk the fallout of logically applying their unitary executive view of government to the Fed). So Congress put a lot of regulatory power in these once independent and non-partisan agencies, and that’s gone. Combine that with a president that is overtly partisan and vindictive, and you have a problem where SCOTUS has created a situation that has elevated the whims of a president above the law Congress created. We will be feeling the affects of this decision for generations, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the catalyst for the failure of the American form of government. Our system cannot sustain when coequal branches of government kowtow to politics.

crumpled

This is really bad. Now you can have one puppet, and no dissent. The FCC is set up for this same tactic. 2 vacancies, so down to the minimum quorum there right now. They can change the rule and let Anna Gomez's term expire. Suddenly we'll be reviewing everyone's licenses and seeing all the TV and radio content becoming more right-wing.

alexpotato

I believe it was CFTC that had a rule that no two members of its governing body could ever be in the same private space at the same time. The idea being that they could not discuss important matters privately but only when in the official committee discussions. This included elevators so if one of them was about to get on and the other one was already there, the first person had to let the elevator go without them.

neonate

Article works when I click on it from Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=One%20person%20is%20now%20a%...

ElevenLathe

"unitary executive" is just Modern Standard American for "Führerprinzip": all authority flows directly from Dear Leader down, all the way from the White House to the schoolteacher and the cop.

roughly

Aside from the obvious attack vectors, this is just an incredibly fragile system. That’s fine if you’re willing to just go ahead and make all the actual humans whole when the cards collapse, but if not, you probably want this system to fail closed.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
8,581 stories · 80,399 chunks indexed