Ofcom Wants American Police to Collect Its Speech Fine
delichon
20 points
4 comments
July 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 94.5ms across 9,716 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Police Are Spending Opioid Settlement Funds on Flock Cameras cdrnsf · 26 pts · August 27, 2026 · 50% similar
- Ban Flock Act Proposed in the US Sente TeaVMFan · 45 pts · October 03, 2026 · 46% similar
- The US is charging an American citizen for wiping his phone at the border thinkcontext · 32 pts · July 27, 2026 · 46% similar
- Federal Judge Rules a Flock Search Was Unconstitutional pavel_lishin · 40 pts · October 02, 2026 · 45% similar
- Texas city demands $2M for public records on Flock usage 01-_- · 165 pts · October 05, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
jjgreen
The British people would be most grateful were the American police to tell Ofcom to fuck right off.
graemep
Essentially OSA forces people to use foreign services by penalising British providers with compliance costs, thereby increasing dependence on foreign services and big tech.
mindslight
> 4chan’s answer has been the same throughout. It operates only in the United States, breaks no American law, and enjoys constitutional protection for what it publishes. Imagine if big tech had one tenth of this amount of spine, and had insisted on this idea that jurisdiction only applies to where a business operates. But rather they caved (chiefly to China first), fostering terrible precedents that communication creates some kind of legal nexus at the location of the other party to a protocol. The legal regime of the net should have that of people standing on opposite sides of a border and shouting across to one another. Instead it's effectively one world jurisdiction consisting of a superset of laws from all countries powerful enough to strong arm other countries.