My 1992 view of the problems of computer programming in 1992
pavel_lishin
31 points
6 comments
June 21, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 123.4ms across 11,176 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? (1977) [pdf] tosh · 21 pts · March 22, 2026 · 54% similar
- Programming Still Sucks jeromechoo · 257 pts · May 06, 2026 · 54% similar
- Programming as Theory Building (1985) [pdf] birdculture · 26 pts · May 19, 2026 · 54% similar
- The Two Worlds of Programming HotGarbage · 13 pts · March 19, 2026 · 53% similar
- Rob Pike’s Rules of Programming (1989) vismit2000 · 901 pts · March 18, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
PaulHoule
Before the Dragon Book some commercial compilers used heroic techniques that got superior performance along various axes.
jmclnx
>In the middle 1970's, the IBM corporation did (and perhaps still does) most of their in-house programming in a computer language called FORTRAN. Sorry, I doubt that. In the middle 70s it was COBOL, when COBOL'74 came out it became king of in-house programming for IBM and many other companies. Now if you said the 60s or science based programming, I would agree with you about FORTRAN. But in-house usually means running the business, that is where COBOL rules. Now, in-house is SAP ABAP, I think that took over at IBM in the mid to late 90s and early 00s. But IBM is moving to the next release of SAP and from what I heard from people there, ABAP is being phased out for something new that SAP came up with.
readthenotes1
In the mid-1970s Alan k. Was working at Xerox Parc creating Smalltalk and the future. Sadly, it didn't sell paper.
DANmode
> Computer programming is still a black art. It's less than fifty years old, and nobody is very good at it yet. We can make better tools than we know how to use.