Meta must pay $375M for violating New Mexico child exploitation law

cdrnsf 14 points 2 comments March 24, 2026
www.cnbc.com · View on Hacker News

Discussion Highlights (2 comments)

franrai

What about X?

salawat

So... Question. Seeing as Zuck is the majority voting shareholder and highest ranked executive, why isn't there a piercing of the corporate veil going on? This isn't some distributed blame case. Ultimately, his decision making led to what the jury finds objectionable. I find it absurd that somehow, the corporate veil is able to absorb even this? Somebody accepted the risk. That somebody is at the top of the pyramid. Want to send a message? Get 'em.

Semantic search powered by Rivestack pgvector
3,471 stories · 32,344 chunks indexed