Meta is set to pay its top AI executives almost a billion each in bonuses
seekdeep
46 points
28 comments
April 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 60.7ms across 4,259 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Meta Lays Off 700 Employees, While Rewarding Top Executives nickvec · 17 pts · March 25, 2026 · 71% similar
- Meta planning layoffs as AI costs mount: Reuters nova22033 · 13 pts · March 14, 2026 · 66% similar
- Meta Lays Off 700 Employees, While Rewarding Top Executives donohoe · 50 pts · March 25, 2026 · 66% similar
- Meta weighing 20% workforce layoffs to offset AI infrastructure costs: report 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 21 pts · March 14, 2026 · 65% similar
- Meta planning layoffs as AI costs mount Aboutplants · 42 pts · March 14, 2026 · 63% similar
Discussion Highlights (13 comments)
alsetmusic
I wish I was overpaid for finishing in fourth place or worse.
chmod775
That's enough to personally buy out every politician in certain places for decades. Many shy back from thinking too hard about the riduculous wealth some accumulate, because then they would have to come to the realization that the reality they live in is fundementally fucked up. Living is just easier with a bit of intentional ignorance and apathy.
elphinstone
They should invest in a Mars colony and all go there and never come back and leave us alone.
jerojero
They must have done really well with their AI projects.
sandbags
No VORP calculations in US tech I see.
mrlonglong
Billionaires shouldn't exist for as long as there's inequality. Purge them all, they've made a massive mess of things.
xvxvx
Is it just me or has money like this lost it's appeal and value? A billion dollars used to be unthinkable, now it's just some number. Companies valued at X doesn't even raise an eyebrow for me. It's like were playing with Monopoly money.
oompydoompy74
I can’t imagine receiving that amount of money and not turning around and giving almost all of it to my local community. Hell I could keep 50 or 60 million and live extremely wealthy for the rest of my life and never work again.
LocalH
I feel like we need a society where the amount of capital you get to keep is inversely proportional to how much you give back to society, on a percentage level. Have $100 billion dollars? Great. The more you give back in charity and community, the more you get to keep. Care more about "number go brrr" and less about your fellow man? We tax all kinds of personally harmful behavior like drinking and smoking. We should also tax anti-social behavior similarly. Someone like Musk with multiple hundreds of billions of dollars in capital should lose 75% of it unless you give back at least 25 or 30% of it, minimum. I'm not qualified to decide the exact percentage points. But we have to do something to keep the rich from vacuuming up almost every penny that exists. Relevant for perception, possibly the greatest such illustration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YUWDrLazCg Daily reminder that to this day, John Rockefeller is considered one of the wealthiest humans in history, despite the fact that today's billionaires dwarf his raw numbers.
SSShupe
Because they couldn't find anyone decent who would do it for $500 million.
twodave
This is the answer to whether AI executives actually take their own rhetoric seriously. If they actually believed in things like UBI as a solution they’d be doing something besides this.
la64710
Why is AI so much worth to Meta?
vr46
Genuine Stupidity