Mathematicians Build Long-Awaited Graph Sandwich
ibobev
74 points
19 comments
September 18, 2026
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20765
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 72.0ms across 7,105 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Inside the Secret Math Society Known Simply as Nicolas Bourbaki pykello · 19 pts · July 19, 2026 · 52% similar
- The Dark Night of Mathematics rmdmphilosopher · 187 pts · July 25, 2026 · 51% similar
- A graph that should be front-page news rakel_rakel · 637 pts · July 13, 2026 · 49% similar
- Theo Conjecture solves 35-year-old math problem, finds a term no one predicted otalp · 33 pts · July 29, 2026 · 49% similar
- If math is more than proof, we need to better celebrate the rest of it num42 · 336 pts · September 19, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
NickNaraghi
Seems like this would have strong implications for distillation and/or smaller types of transformers!
mindleyhilner
Actual meat: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20765
bhouston
I am not a mathematician but are most papers now accompanied by a lean proof? Is there a central repository of lean proofs shared by mathematicians like an npm repository of JavaScript packages? Does it all depend on a stupid is-odd package in the end?
Sniffnoy
Wondering: if the process for the upper part of the sandwich is the complement of the process for the lower part, why was it so much more difficult? What would go wrong if you took one of the earlier lower-sandwich processes, and complemented it in a similar way? I have to assume it's something, but what?
omnicognate
Hilarious - a mathematical result that afaict has nothing whatsoever to do with AI, and 75% of the comments are about AI, including this one!
cryptolobster
Given how much surrounding machinery the graph sandwich proof depends on, would it even be feasible to formalize it in Lean without first formalizing large chunks of random graph theory? And if not, does that mean results like this will stay out of reach for formal verification for the foreseeable future?