Making 768 servers look like 1
aarvin_roshin
22 points
3 comments
July 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 75.4ms across 5,215 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Making 768 servers look like 1 hisamafahri · 30 pts · July 16, 2026 · 100% similar
- Scaling to 1M concurrent sandboxes in seconds thundergolfer · 47 pts · July 16, 2026 · 55% similar
- Let's Build PlanetScale from Scratch: Infrastructure onatm · 136 pts · July 16, 2026 · 46% similar
- Building watchable digital twins of 64 World Cup games rogerdickey · 18 pts · July 23, 2026 · 46% similar
- "Two 2030 AMD racks are expected to deliver same compute as 570 racks in 2024" lossolo · 11 pts · August 19, 2026 · 46% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
bddicken
Hey, I wrote this! Sharding is cool and foundational to making the internet work. I'm around to answer Qs.
elevation
Thanks for a well written article! When spec'ing a signle database host, I've been told to select the highest L1/L2 cache possible (allowing O(n^2) loads to complete with the least IO delay) with IOPs and RAM also being desirable. Does this hold when selecting hardware for shards? Do you ever see unusual ratios between egress bandwidth and shard count? For instance, do you ever see 128 shards under heavy load not managing to saturate a 1GbE link? Would love to see more of your writing on this topic.