Lossless model compression experiment: GLM-5.2 in 25% less memory
hambandit
16 points
1 comment
July 20, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 125.6ms across 9,963 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Bonsai 2 27B: Near-Lossless Compression in a 9x Smaller Footprint JonSchneider · 344 pts · September 17, 2026 · 62% similar
- GLM-5.3 is now open-weight jeudesprits · 646 pts · August 28, 2026 · 61% similar
- Can gzip be a language model? networked · 387 pts · September 22, 2026 · 58% similar
- Show HN: Getting GLM 5.2 running on my slow computer vforno · 513 pts · July 09, 2026 · 55% similar
- One month coding with GLM 5.3 Flash ThibWeb · 135 pts · October 02, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
Sanzig
So, if I'm understanding correctly, this is just for lower bandwidth transfers of full BF16 weights over the wire, not for serving, correct? Have you benchmarked the performance against a SOTA general purpose compression algorithm like zstd? Also, are all that many people handling the BF16 weights directly? GLM-5.2's reference deployment is FP8, and many vendors are even serving at NVFP4 which seems to offer negligible degradation over the FP8 reference deployments.