Lossless model compression experiment: GLM-5.2 in 25% less memory
hambandit
16 points
1 comment
July 20, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 55.1ms across 5,564 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- GLM-5.3 is now open-weight jeudesprits · 646 pts · August 28, 2026 · 61% similar
- Show HN: Getting GLM 5.2 running on my slow computer vforno · 513 pts · July 09, 2026 · 55% similar
- GLM-5.3-Flash Philpax · 958 pts · August 26, 2026 · 54% similar
- GLM 5.2 is nearly as accurate as a human book keeper adamkurkiewicz · 196 pts · July 09, 2026 · 54% similar
- GLM-5.3 Artificial Analysis Benchmarks apitman · 114 pts · August 18, 2026 · 52% similar
Discussion Highlights (1 comments)
Sanzig
So, if I'm understanding correctly, this is just for lower bandwidth transfers of full BF16 weights over the wire, not for serving, correct? Have you benchmarked the performance against a SOTA general purpose compression algorithm like zstd? Also, are all that many people handling the BF16 weights directly? GLM-5.2's reference deployment is FP8, and many vendors are even serving at NVFP4 which seems to offer negligible degradation over the FP8 reference deployments.