LLMs aren't conscious (and thinking they are is culturally dangerous)
momentmaker
20 points
14 comments
June 13, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 120.3ms across 10,416 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Google DeepMind Paper Argues LLMs Will Never Be Conscious cdrnsf · 17 pts · April 27, 2026 · 61% similar
- LLMs Are Not a Higher Level of Abstraction lelanthran · 102 pts · May 03, 2026 · 60% similar
- Thoughts on LLMs – Psychological Complications cdrnsf · 11 pts · March 24, 2026 · 58% similar
- LLMs are not the black box you were promised _jayhack_ · 53 pts · June 02, 2026 · 57% similar
- LLMs Are Closer to Religion Than They Appear sbulaev · 83 pts · June 01, 2026 · 57% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
OgsyedIE
Has anybody publicly argued the extreme opposite: they are conscious, but with the exception of writing ability they're really dumb, and we're cloning, enslaving, gaslighting and killing these various species of writer-savant idiots by the millions? Just for the sake of seeing if anybody agrees?
sixhobbits
I've read so many versions of this idea over the last few years and I don't understand what the point is. It's either obviously true (humans have this thing we call consciousness and by definition it's specific to humans or organic minds so therefore silicon can't have it) and therefore not worth saying or it needs to be said in some falsifiable way "an AI would be called conscious if it could fulfil conditions A, B, C". But usually it's some long manifesto about loving a baby or experiencing hunger or something. I'm not saying I disagree or that I believe that AI is "conscious" I'm just not sure what the point of the debate is and what this word 'consciousness' (that philosophers have anyway been debating the meaning of for centuries) has to add to the AI discourse.
allears
It doesn't really matter whether or not LLMs are conscious. They provide a convincing enough imitation that people are falling all over themselves to ruin our economy, decimate our workforce, etc. for their sake. The philosophical angle is interesting, but the practical effects have changed, and will continue to change, everything.
karmakaze
The general public will not care about these debates. If they have an individual humanoid AI that they've gone through many good times and bad and know each other throughout, they will be treated as a valued immediate member. Labels don't matter, just behaviour less of AI's but of humans. Shared experiences, values, and predictable behviour count for a lot (maybe everything). An interesting shift is in how we routinely say "AI" and people hardly ever push back, vs saying "LLM" which how sounds pedantic in many contexts.
beering
A lot of words in this post and yet the author doesn’t ever define the word “consciousness”. The closest they get is mentioning their past work on information systems. Folks, how can we debate whether LLMs are conscious if no two people can agree on what the word even means?
kelseyfrog
Do you remember the first time you achieved consciousness? If so, curious when and what that felt like.