LLMs are not superhuman at reading and writing neural network weights
agrm
50 points
4 comments
November 02, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 112.7ms across 11,391 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Learning Programming in an Age of LLMs moneroloop2018 · 236 pts · September 16, 2026 · 61% similar
- LLMs as a Cognitive Virus canjobear · 239 pts · September 05, 2026 · 59% similar
- LLMs Are Still Toxic, Stuck in the Past, and Bad at Math Eyosias_x5 · 15 pts · July 24, 2026 · 59% similar
- Don't be fooled–LLMs don't reason leopoldj · 67 pts · October 02, 2026 · 58% similar
- LLMs could control their host machines by exploiting inference engines zdw · 117 pts · August 24, 2026 · 58% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
nfw2
One could say they might be "superhuman" here in the same way that LLMs might be said to be superhuman at math. Perhaps they do this work faster and more effectively than any person could manually. But they are certainly still doing it the "human" way ie reasoning with legible and coherent thoughts, rather than communing through some Matrix-like symbology which is what people who skimmed the article seem to be assuming.
ChrisArchitect
Discussion on source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50341174
nagi_builds
"I think a smart human ML researcher could perform all of these tasks." And do that for how long?