Legislation Killed Would Have Effectively Blocked Police LPR, Including Flock
jhonovich
108 points
62 comments
May 28, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 743.5ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Are Your Local Police Using Flock Safety ALPRs to Scan for Immigrants? jhonovich · 14 pts · June 26, 2026 · 57% similar
- A Bipartisan Amendment Would End Police License Plate Tracking Nationwide cdrnsf · 238 pts · May 21, 2026 · 56% similar
- LAPD lets contract with surveillance giant Flock expire forks · 441 pts · July 13, 2026 · 53% similar
- Flock Holding Closed Police Conference, Requires Police Consent for Marketing jhonovich · 51 pts · May 04, 2026 · 52% similar
- Flock Flocked up: How a license plate camera misread unraveled one man's life text0404 · 51 pts · March 10, 2026 · 51% similar
Discussion Highlights (4 comments)
firefoxd
Is there an easier way to make this statement? So did we kill a legislation that would have blocked Police license plate readers and Flock? Or because the legislation is killed, we can block Police license plate readers and flock?
FateOfNations
It also would essentially have blocked all traffic enforcement cameras (red light, speed, bus lane, school bus passing, etc.) too.
pimlottc
"LPR", used 16 times in the article (including the title), stands for "License Plate Recognition"
arjie
Okay so it reads: > A recipient of assistance under title 23, United States Code, may not use automated license plate readers for any purpose other than tolling. Okay, I'm glad that's killed. I love the speed cameras near my home. And hopefully the future has every red-light backed by a red-light camera.