John Deere to pay $99M in right-to-repair settlement
CharlesW
256 points
65 comments
April 08, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 50.0ms across 3,961 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Tech Companies Are Trying to Neuter Colorado's Landmark Right-to-Repair Law liz_ifixit · 43 pts · April 03, 2026 · 44% similar
- After a lawsuit, USDA agrees to share climate risk data with farmers Brajeshwar · 12 pts · March 04, 2026 · 43% similar
- Right to repair: Why the US military can't fix much of its own equipment scythe · 33 pts · April 05, 2026 · 42% similar
- Meta ordered to pay $375M in New Mexico trial over child exploitation gostsamo · 45 pts · March 25, 2026 · 41% similar
- Judge finalizes order for Greenpeace to pay $345M in ND oil pipeline case gmays · 182 pts · March 02, 2026 · 40% similar
Discussion Highlights (14 comments)
verdverm
The second paragraph likely answers some of your immediate questions > The settlement also includes an agreement by Deere to provide “the digital tools required for the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair” of tractors, combines, and other machinery for 10 years. That part is crucial, as farmers previously resorted to hacking their own equipment’s software just to get it up and running again. John Deere signed a memorandum of understanding in 2023 that partially addressed those concerns, providing third parties with the technology to diagnose and repair, as long as its intellectual property was safeguarded. Monday’s settlement seems to represent a much stronger (and legally binding) step forward.
darth_avocado
The stock is up 5% today. What’s the catch?
chasil
The complete crack of Deere's firmware in 2022 must have had some impact on this. https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/16/john_deere_doom/ Edit: 'Sick Codes confirmed that he believes John Deere failed to comply with its GPL obligations. "I'd love for them to come forward and explain how they are in compliance," he said.'
SilverElfin
Seems like a small price for a big company. Shouldn’t there be some higher punitive fine for even trying this tactic? It’s basically zero cost for companies to be abusive.
causality0
One of the most user-hostile companies on earth. My John Deere lawnmower came with a fuel gauge that runs off a CR2032 that's embedded in epoxy. The battery runs out of charge in about six months and the gauge stops working. If you saw the gauge open and replace the battery it doesn't start working again. If you disconnect the gauge the lawnmower won't start. Replacement gauges are $60.
shevy-java
Good! Wonder if Louis Rossmann already mentioned that.
bearjaws
Needs another zero, likely made 9 figures in revenue from this scheme.
mothballed
I bought a ~completely mechanical tractor without ECU right under the 25hp cutoff that requires computer and emissions controls to get around this bullshit. The adding of DPF and/or SCR to agricultural diesels gave vendors cover to fuck the customer using the excuse of preventing emissions tampering.
skeptrune
this is awesome. beyond happy to see it
pnw
Up to one third of that $99m goes to attorneys. Named plaintiffs get $25k each and class members get what's left over, which could be anything from $50 to $5k according to ChatGPT. I wonder if they'll throw in free credit monitoring with that?
Robdel12
Woah, childs play money for the amount of pain, lock in, and money they’ve cost farmers.
datahack
This is woefully inadequate as a remedy. The dollar amount is minuscule and the remedy time limited. Seems like they just got a license to continue business as usual.
itbeho
I live in a wine region in central Calif where everyone has a tractor. We bought a Kubota, enjoy using it and get a lot of work done with it. We have a neighbor that bought a new John Deere and for about a 3 month period we endured nothing but abuse from him because we didn't buy "American". Then his problems started...
silexia
Farmer here. We only run equipment made before 2000 and all of our tractors are from the 1980s. We badly need right to repair.