Jobs was right. Gates was wrong
lrsaturnino
19 points
5 comments
April 28, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 82.9ms across 8,303 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Marc Andreessen Is Right That AI Isn't Killing Jobs. Interest Rate Hikes Are bigbobbeeper · 29 pts · April 02, 2026 · 53% similar
- The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: New Jobs aphyr · 254 pts · April 15, 2026 · 48% similar
- I spent my whole career building passive income. Here's what I got wrong speckx · 21 pts · May 16, 2026 · 46% similar
- Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection surprisetalk · 375 pts · April 03, 2026 · 45% similar
- The demise of software engineering jobs has been greatly exaggerated ryan_j_naughton · 17 pts · April 08, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
superxpro12
This seems incredibly obvious to me I guess, because its an industry standard play. Establish marketshare, then monetize. And right now, the industry is caught in this feedback loop that seems to inflate the stock prices of everyone involved. AI needs gpu's, which grows the gpu sector, which AI needs, because if its userbase. And then it buys more gpus. The growth has to stop at SOME point... I'm waiting for a massive shoe to drop on token pricing. It's unsustainable.
goodmythical
Published today, leading with "Recently, I ran an AI model locally and reached a conclusion that is hard to ignore: the major LLM providers are probably operating with substantial subsidies to sustain their services at current prices." is wild. How do you get all the way to running a local model without having heard that this is the case? Like...it's so well documented...I wonder if author knows that a portion of the subsidy is that the models are being trained on free, cheap, and chat models...
avmich
The quote at the beginning is of Alan Kay though. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alan_Kay