J-space comparisons across open models
babelfish
20 points
5 comments
July 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 58.8ms across 5,215 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- State of Open Models: Summer 2026 Observations gmays · 36 pts · September 01, 2026 · 58% similar
- Using an open model feels surprisingly good msaltz · 173 pts · July 28, 2026 · 54% similar
- Jensen Huang on why open models matter r3trohack3r · 22 pts · July 24, 2026 · 50% similar
- 6 months to live for open models g42gregory · 31 pts · July 12, 2026 · 49% similar
- Our position on open-weights models surprisetalk · 701 pts · July 27, 2026 · 49% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
suddenlybananas
>ok so everything except this message is "vibe coded". when reading the anthropic paper, i had a few ideas about behaviors of this "jspace" i was curious about. i asked fable to brainstorm with me and also let it suggest more experiments that would be interesting. then i let it run experiments autonomously (almost) on our cluster. i'm not an expert in this domain and the experiment design as well as my ideas probably don't make total sense for someone who is. How can anyone trust anything at all here?
hadlock
The J stands for Jacobian, ref Jacobian Matrix, Jacobian "Lens"
MycroftJones
What the Viking Poets Knew (and AI Researchers Need To) has some discussion of J-space in Chapter 3. The things the book mentions are being discovered and implemented in real time. Just 6 more layers to go. https://moebiusv.github.io/papers/papers/viking-poets/