Is this product 'human-made'? The race to establish an AI-free logo
jjgreen
22 points
4 comments
March 16, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 882.7ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Why do AI company logos look like buttholes? (2025) miniBill · 419 pts · July 18, 2026 · 57% similar
- We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes tony_cannistra · 99 pts · July 15, 2026 · 56% similar
- Let's celebrate work that is 100% human-made supryan · 65 pts · June 05, 2026 · 55% similar
- Unlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI myaccountonhn · 13 pts · May 31, 2026 · 54% similar
- Unlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI cratermoon · 20 pts · June 01, 2026 · 54% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
the_biot
Somebody in the article mentions that it's a spectrum, not a binary, and she's right: you can't call it AI-free if your product is human-made but all the marketing is AI slop. I thought EEVBlog's Dave Jones had a good idea for exactly this kind of problem when advertising open source hardware [0]: a logo that clearly showed which parts were open. [0] https://www.eevblog.com/oshw/
7777777phil
Same economics as organic food labeling imo. Starts as a genuine quality signal, turns into a price premium, gets gamed until the certification means nothing. The harder problem will be (or already is) that most products will be partially AI-assisted and a binary label can't really capture "we used AI for the layout but a human drew every illustration." Good luck defining that boundary tbh.
karmakaze
What good is a certification/logo? That means they passed whatever proxy was used. Smells like a cash grab, as most certifications are or become. We'd need proof with a verifiable supply chain.