Iowa cancer rates surge – farm chemicals are a key risk, new report finds
PaulHoule
30 points
3 comments
April 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 60.2ms across 4,686 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Harvests and food prices at risk as Iran war triggers global fertiliser crunch measurablefunc · 11 pts · March 28, 2026 · 47% similar
- Global farmers face fertilizer shortages due to Persian Gulf supply disruptions speckx · 16 pts · March 11, 2026 · 45% similar
- Toxic PFAS residue identified on 37% of California produce, new analysis finds bookofjoe · 12 pts · March 29, 2026 · 45% similar
- PFAS pesticides contaminate nearly 40% of non-organic California produce OutOfHere · 11 pts · March 12, 2026 · 44% similar
- After a lawsuit, USDA agrees to share climate risk data with farmers Brajeshwar · 12 pts · March 04, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
iAMkenough
Governor says “regulation is hardly ever the answer” for Iowa’s dangerous nitrate levels in its drinking water.
nozzlegear
I live in Iowa and can vouch that conversation around cancer rates, nitrates and pesticides has intensified over the last year, along with our legislature's inaction on the whole thing. Not mentioned in this article were the two bills that have been pushed through the state senate twice now, which would've prevented Iowans from filing lawsuits against pesticide and herbicide companies for failing to warn about cancer risks if those companies follow the EPA's labeling guidelines. The primary lobby of those bills was the pesticide giant Bayer (who bought and absorbed Monsanto) with backing from several of Iowa's industrial farming organizations. They launched a giant ad campaign to "control weeds, not farming" alongside their bill to influence opinions.