I think I found a planet nobody knew existed. I used Claude Code to find it
pyduan
133 points
58 comments
October 08, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 86.8ms across 8,906 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Anthropic found a hidden space where Claude puzzles over concepts pseudolus · 14 pts · July 12, 2026 · 54% similar
- Claude Code from Source pykello · 16 pts · September 18, 2026 · 51% similar
- First atmosphere found on Earth-like planet in habitable zone of distant star neversaydie · 415 pts · July 17, 2026 · 49% similar
- Claude couldn't hack OpenAI. Then Anthropic shipped Opus 5 stared · 12 pts · September 19, 2026 · 47% similar
- Claude Opus 5 alvis · 1435 pts · July 24, 2026 · 47% similar
Discussion Highlights (11 comments)
higeorge13
This is incredible use of AI tools. Big kudos!
wartywhoa23
Found a planet and saved a granny. Wake me up when this planet is acknowledged by any astonomer community with more say than r/ClaudeAI.
k310
Planet Claude? Asking for a friend.
soltanov
Call me when peer review confirms it; until then, it is noise fitting noise. (Reason: Clean cut through the hype directly to scientific validation.)
ContinuityLab
Cool discovery, but I'd be real curious about the false-positive rate when letting coding agents loose on raw astronomical telemetry. Hallucinations in data reduction are no joke.
colijobles
Brilliant application. Imagine the progress we could make with models post trained on scientific process and a good agentic process. I've been tinkering with the latter for the last couple of months. Yesterday my system made some progress on instabilities on a particular superconductive system: https://colinocallaghan.com/autonomous-ai-research/Spatial-P...
__alias
Laughed at the reddit comment > "We got vibe astronomy before GTA6"
amirkhanian
Not an astronomer, but I'm a non-programmer who spent two months building a fairly big web app with Claude, so the false-positive question is the one I'd ask too. What saved me wasn't asking Claude whether it was right (it almost always says yes). It was checks that don't depend on its own report: run it on data where you already know the answer, and give a fresh session only the result and ask it to break it. For a planet hunt I guess that means hiding a few fake planets in real data to see if it finds them, and running the same pipeline on shuffled data to see how many "planets" it finds in pure noise.
elzbardico
Plot twist: The discovery is valid. But we figure out the author was not a innocent PM, but a team of astronomers working for Anthropic, And Anthropic's marketing department come up with the idea of crediting it to a PM. :-D
dkpk
I’m sure we’ll find Planet Nine soon.
hmyn
just this line "I chose what questions to ask, what tests mattered, and what counted as pass/fail."