I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots
nickabe
427 points
221 comments
September 11, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 67.1ms across 6,278 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- How I advertise malicious software on Google Ads xlii · 383 pts · September 09, 2026 · 53% similar
- From 13.5M installs to 499 active devices boban-lukic · 11 pts · August 10, 2026 · 49% similar
- ChatGPT ad targeting is garbage hermitcrab · 36 pts · September 02, 2026 · 46% similar
- Show HN: I built my first MCP to manage Google Ads MichalKrk · 15 pts · September 03, 2026 · 45% similar
- Someone is running mass vulnerability scans, spoofing AI bots like ClaudeBot gavinhking · 261 pts · August 12, 2026 · 42% similar
Discussion Highlights (20 comments)
guywithahat
> I’ll report back on the refund. Good luck on that. I have sympathy for OP, but running ads is really hard. It's why most people set targets for things that happen in the app (OP updated to a target of winning a game, not just installing), and why companies have entire teams dedicated to monitoring Google/Meta/X ads. Trial runs are often thousands of dollars, and it's easy to evaporate money. I've made the same mistakes, and its why y-combinator strongly recommends against running online ads, especially in the beginning.
yalok
this is unfortunately very common - I kept running very small ads regularly over many years (~10 years by now) and the % of bots has been steadily increasing, and Google doesn't really have any system to report those reliably to them. In fact, it's contrary to their incentives to investigate & fix these problems - unless they feel some pressure from competition... From time to time, Google ads sales reps call me and are trying to convince me to increase the ads spend. I complain about bots, and none of them had any suggestion on what I can do to appeal it etc. I mean I can appeal on some specific instance, once - but there's no process to communicate back to Google the cases where I'm 99% certain about bots on regular basis. And these bots get increasingly more sophisticated. They used to just click on ads. Then they started installing the app. Then running the app once and do nothing in it. Then they started tapping on the app screen & actually try to go through some initial app steps. When they do it in a spiky way, it's easy to detect them. But when they do it through some distributed device farms, below noise, it's very hard.
legonigel
What is the incentive for the bot owners? Why do the bots download and install the apps? It has some (very small) cost to them, and I don't understand the value for them.
blitzar
When you are talking to your VC, they are just "installs"
phenomen
If you have their IP addresses in your dashboard, go to Google Ads > Admin > Account Settings > IP Exclusions. Then, add the entire network/data center range there (i.e. 123.4.5.*). In 99% of cases, these bot networks are not run from residential providers. You can confirm IPs at https://ipgeolocation.io/ After running Google Ads for a couple of years, our current exclusion list has over 4000 networks just in the US.
xnx
Switch to a pay app and the problem goes away.
sergiotapia
How much of Google's revenue is just scams? Search for "datadog" and the first result is a sponsored link for Datadog. I click that and datadog had to pay google. scroll a bit down and there's the "real" natural link. Fugazi!
carlosjobim
Digital marketing is a solved problem. You pay a commission on verified real sales to affiliates, and they can do what the hell they please to make those sales. If somebody like Google or Meta cannot promise X amount of sales for Y amount of ad money spent, then you are a fool to give them any money. They have all the algorithms and profiles on everybody, so it's their job to match your product to customers. Why should you have to tweak who will be targeted? Well, the answer is that many people owe their paycheck to not letting their employers or shareholders know that digital marketing is a solved problem.
dave_sid
Google ads are a con. Meta ads are a con. If someone tells you you’re just not doing it right yet, they’re probably trying to sell you something.
erwan577
The app appears unavailable in France in Google Play is that expected ? My phone is a pixel.
alfiedotwtf
Who would waste their time running a bot farm just to click ads? Almost sounds like Google are paying these farms
fHr
Google promoting scams via ads 24 7 these days
rybosworld
I've suspected that google has been turning a blind eye to ad fraud for a few years now. In the early-mid 2010's, ad fraud wasn't nearly as common. And it's absolutely not the case that google can't detect ad fraud - in fact they are VERY good at detecting it when they want to.
pseudonymidy
Your post led me to install your app and play through 10 puzzles. The post doesn’t even show the app! What’s the name for this sort of marketing? I really like the interface you’ve built for completing the puzzles. Very clean - it’s very nice to not be bombarded at every screen.
XCSme
This will always remind me of the post I made 10 years ago, with Facebook ads being 100% robots... With a small budget, in 15 years I never managed to get any positive ROI on any online platform I tried advertising on. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/marketing/comments/4smisl/facebook_...
yunusabd
My favorite story: 1. Dev publishes app with Google Admob integration to the Play Store. 2. Buys Google Ads to drive traffic to the app. 3. Google Admob bans his account for invalid traffic. https://www.reddit.com/r/admob/comments/1vzg3fu/i_paid_googl...
odie5533
Did they like your app?
bar000n
Sorry, I am new here, but who funds that bot farm? i don't get it
chung8123
At this point you have to just factor bots into your marketing costs. You have to go by overall cost per acquisition not cost per click.
gsky
Google cheats publishers also. all big companies are evil these days