How SpaceX Streamlined the Raptor Engine
JumpCrisscross
29 points
2 comments
September 17, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 68.9ms across 7,105 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- 'Starwashing': The new space race has an environmental problem speckx · 11 pts · September 03, 2026 · 50% similar
- Hybrid-Electric Aicraft Engine Targeting 30% Fuel Efficiency r2sk5t · 88 pts · July 23, 2026 · 48% similar
- SpaceX Starship Flight 13 livestream [video] cryptoz · 106 pts · July 24, 2026 · 47% similar
- Cursor is now a part of SpaceX billy_jones_75 · 98 pts · August 14, 2026 · 45% similar
- SpaceX and the myth of independent Wall St research aanet · 14 pts · July 17, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (2 comments)
avmich
The thrust vector control (TVC) subsystem is usually considered a part of the engine. The major change the Soviet NK-33 underwent for a USA model was the addition of TVC, and the engine was named differently, so there are two engines, named differently, which mostly differ by the presence of TVC. Raptors can be used without TVC. Be that by using differential thrust, or just not needing that - because rocket is controlled using other means, or other engines - it's possible. Tory Bruno specifically explained that he meant - among other things - that absence. A picture of the engine working on the test stand can be that for the engine - or for the chamber, a significant component of the engine, with or without turbopumps involved.
fragmede
3d printing metal has come a long way!