Honda is killing its EVs – and any chance of competing in the future
sylvainkalache
31 points
31 comments
March 15, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 51.3ms across 3,471 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Western carmakers' retreat from electric risks dooming them to irrelevance n1b0m · 173 pts · March 21, 2026 · 59% similar
- Tesla loses Toyota and Stellantis from EU CO2 pool, taking billions with them breve · 27 pts · March 03, 2026 · 48% similar
- Toyota’s $15,000 EV surpasses 80,000 deliveries in China in its first year breve · 11 pts · March 10, 2026 · 48% similar
- Another automaker joins BYD with ultra-fast 1,500 kW EV chargers breve · 13 pts · March 10, 2026 · 47% similar
- Why $4 gasoline is the tipping point for EVs speckx · 11 pts · March 19, 2026 · 45% similar
Discussion Highlights (9 comments)
tim-tday
The wind is just blowing back towards internal combustion for the moment. A couple years and they will shift again. Killing the whole research project would be dumb. Killing current models makes some sense.
mono442
ICE cars are still the majority of new cars being sold and it'll still take a while for EVs to become more popular.
ta9000
Ironically, Trump attacking Iran and closing the Strait is a boon to China and EV makers. Once the car is produced, aside from lubricants, it’s completely independent of oil. Heck you can put panels on your rooftop and slow charge it during the day.
nytesky
Honda is an engine company at its heart. It makes very reliable, long lived engines. They refine technology not really invent it (maybe invented VTEC). The transition to EV will be very gradual, I don’t even think we have enough rare earth metals and electrical grid capacity to go even twice as fast in adoption? Honda is waiting for the standards and technology to settle out and become commodity technology, then they implement and iterate to a refined and reliable product. It doesn’t seem like a winner take all market for EV? What would be the most? Perhaps I am ignorant on that part of market dynamics. *edit for typos
jerlam
Do people really want "software defined vehicles"? People keep repeating how Tesla keeps upgrading their software, but I don't really want my car to change every time I step into it. The person I know who loves FSD has soured on updates since the last one changed how the car handles simple things like intersections, and it's added a lot more stress. Cars should be appliances, boring and reliable, not something to amaze and delight you. Especially since the latter usually changes into "sell ads and your personal information".
tim-projects
This doesn't mention motorcycles > For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (FY2025), motorcycles accounted for about 17% of total revenue, while cars made up around 65%. I wonder what the plan is for motorcycles, where in much of Asia cars aren't really viable and there are no real competitors to Honda engine bikes.
epolanski
I hate those narratives that if you don't jump on EVs, your future is doomed. The last 5 years just don't show it. The EV market is still small and infrastructure missing in most of the world. Toyota played it safe and made bank when everybody was saying they were doomed. German automakers went hard on EVs. VW group sold 1 million fully electric vehicles in 2025, they will probably overtake Tesla in a couple of years for the biggest non-Chinese EV automaker by sales, but is it paying off financially? At the same time german premium brands have a very hard time differentiating when Chinese cars offer similar quality at half the price even after tariffs.
GianFabien
Smart doorbells and thermostats that upgraded in the night often became a nuisance or an expensive brick. But a faulty software upgrade on a car can kill you and others. Car company execs need to take a chill pill followed by a reality serum. Monetizing subscription based basic features and delivering in-car advertising is the absolutely worst way to go. As consumers we need to stop buying into the bells, whistles and trinkets and demand essential and safe transportation.
steve-atx-7600
“Many automakers have found that dropping batteries into a car originally designed for an internal combustion engine”. Reminds me of idiotic hybrid variants of Subaru and Honda vehicles that don’t have spare tires because the battery was slapped into the existing vehicle platform as an afterthought. Eg. Subaru forester hybrid. Car bought by educated, practical folks.