Hanami 3.0: In Full Bloom
PuercoPop
87 points
26 comments
July 01, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 1091.0ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Kyoto cherry blossoms now bloom earlier than at any point in 1,200 years momentmaker · 311 pts · April 29, 2026 · 46% similar
- 1,200 years of peak cherry blossom dates in Kyoto tzury · 13 pts · April 10, 2026 · 43% similar
- Komai: a fine Matrix chat app you can get to love anotherevan · 41 pts · May 08, 2026 · 42% similar
- The Harajuku Moment (2024) abhaynayar · 74 pts · June 18, 2026 · 42% similar
- Haiku tosh · 162 pts · May 13, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
itsdesmond
Hanami is quite nice. I haven’t had the opportunity to use it in anger but I have had a crush on it for a while now. I really do hope ROM-rb, the not-orm Hanami uses, gets some development love as a consequence of this more formal merger. It’s a rad tool with enough rough edges that I had to switch away from it when launching a product a few years ago.
xswhiskey
It'd be nice to see some benchmarks to compare the before vs after on the perf gains in the Faster by default heading. Love the work though; having beautifully crafted options like Hanami around is a joy.
paozac
I'm happy someone's challenging the Rails almost-monoculture in the Ruby ecosystem, but Hanami doesn't seem to bring much to the table. Is there anything in this release that Rails hasn't had for years?
pclowes
I have loosely followed Hanami for years but never used it or heard of it used in a large codebase. I still don't quite understand what it does all that differently from Rails? There are plenty of comments that are along the lines of > "Hanami brings is an intentional and well-reasoned architecture that supports building maintainable applications. It has taste" (posted below) But concretely what does that mean? Their docs call out ways to avoid common rails anti-patterns and I agree with most of their opinions but you don't _have_ to write bad code in rails just because a lot of others have. Having seen Rails deprecations at multiple large well known tech cos I appreciate the sentiment of an "architecture that grows with you" but I would say the driver behind those migrations wasn't so much the framework as the extreme flexibility of the code and what that produces with thousands of developers over 10+ years. I don't see how any architecture of Hanami prevents that.
swe_dima
many years ago when Hanami was just getting popular I remember doing benchmarks against Rails when it comes to SQL and was unpleasantly surprised when Rails' ActiveRecord ended up being much faster, despite "speed" being advertised as one of the advantages :-(
JustSkyfall
Big congrats on the release! I have been using Rails 8 for the past few months on a work project, but the Hanakai ecosystem looks really, really interesting. My one question would be whether or not Hanakai supports Inertia or Svelte views - we've been moving away from ERB recently, which has made it much easier to write interactive code due to the ecosystem, and I'd rather not throw that DX away!
poszlem
I've used Hanami in exactly one production codebase (but it was a huge one). I fully expect to hear the chorus of "skill issue" TM type of comments and honestly, I won't even argue with that. But that app was hands down one of the messiest, most overengineered pile of hot garbage I've ever laid eyes on, and I can't shake the feeling that at least SOME of the blame lands on the framework itself, for nudging you toward a design where you drown in an explosion of tiny classes that do nothing but hide the actual behaviour from you.
gverrilla
Great web design.