GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly this Thursday
jfrbfbreudh
80 points
23 comments
July 08, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 462.1ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra will be in Codex mfiguiere · 182 pts · July 06, 2026 · 64% similar
- GPT-5.5 rd · 1240 pts · April 23, 2026 · 64% similar
- GPT-5.4 mudkipdev · 739 pts · March 05, 2026 · 63% similar
- GPT-5.4 meetpateltech · 156 pts · March 05, 2026 · 63% similar
- GPT-5.6 logickkk1 · 1171 pts · July 09, 2026 · 63% similar
Discussion Highlights (10 comments)
ray__
Any previewers have hot takes? I've really preferred gpt-5.5 over Opus 4.8 for data analysis and scientific software work. It seems much more reliable. Fable is unusable for the type of work that I do (due to guardrails). Really looking forward to trying these new OpenAI models out.
aarvin_roshin
Thoughts[^0] from Theo, who had early access: > It's a damn good model. Not quite as "smart" as Fable, but it is incredibly capable. Fixed all the problems I had with GPT-5.5. > It is incredibly determined. Will run for a day without even using a /goal. It understands subagents incredibly well and is great at orchestrating. It's super pleasant in use cases like OpenClaw and Hermes Agent. It knows iOS dev incredibly well. > It has rough edges too, but FAR fewer than 5.5 did. > For many things, gpt-5.6-sol will become my obvious defaults. > It is better about [following instructions] than 5.5 was. Understands intent well and hammers until it gets there. Sometimes a bit too hard. Also[^1]: > gpt-5.6-sol is world leading in computer use. It made me use it 100x more. When we lost access to 5.6, I quickly started to go insane without it [^0]: https://nitter.net/theo/status/2074708892341481755 [^1]: https://nitter.net/theo/status/2074720467395756499
reassess_blind
I’m bouncing back between Codex and Claude like a ping-pong ball. I much prefer the experience using Codex, less verbose and to-the-point I’ve found. But Fable, being as strong as it is, is a big draw for Claude right now. I’ll likely switch back to Codex if 5.6 Sol is comparable.
laurels-marts
Damn this is exciting. I love that gpt models are much faster, efficient and cheaper than Claude models. They are so fast even on high/xhigh that I don’t find myself using the parallel agent setup anymore much since its cognitively less demanding to just follow along what the model is doing and most tasks it will complete in <5-<10mins anyway.
aarvin_roshin
I'm most curious about whether OpenAI finally taught its models how to design interfaces. They have been behind the other labs in this area for what feels like ages.
jorisw
Mirror: https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2074704958419792299
mhrmsn
Is this the reason Anthropic extended use of Fable 5 via subscriptions until July 12? Seems a bit like it
yzydserd
The question is, launch to who …
simianwords
I find codex way more usable. It’s not pretentiously verbose like Claude. It’s also responsive - I can see the progress easily and steer the conversation. With Claude, it might take 15 minutes and I would lose patience.
matheusmoreira
Will it be available on subscription tiers? That will get me to switch away from Anthropic.