GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options for Nuclear Cleanup
Jimmc414
172 points
74 comments
July 07, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 628.9ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- White House will dump $700M of public funds into costly, unreliable coal again Bender · 30 pts · June 04, 2026 · 45% similar
- U.S. Seeks to Give Weapons-Grade Plutonium to Startups for Fuel stephenhuey · 27 pts · May 26, 2026 · 44% similar
- Grok Is More Important Than Clean Air, DOJ Says virgildotcodes · 12 pts · June 28, 2026 · 44% similar
- DOGE goes nuclear: How Trump invited SV into America's nuclear power regulator epistasis · 15 pts · March 21, 2026 · 43% similar
- EPA Moves to Ease Coal Ash Regulations for Power Plants 1vuio0pswjnm7 · 14 pts · April 12, 2026 · 43% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
actionfromafar
Ouch. Two billion dollars. That could have been put into much better use, imagine being able to fund the Iran war for one more day.
dakolli
A bunch of these nuclear power startups have started reached criticality over the last week. Aalo and Valar (thiel) and now GAO is trying to loosen regulations around nuclear waste disposal.. Makes sense. Weird how we only get green energy when it's necessary for the technocratic class to power their data centers (and when they are small enough to be flown on location for the military, so the military can destroy a nations power production capabilities and still be able to power their invasions). During Valar's announcement this week regarding achieving their goals of nuclear power generation they did a tech-style keynote address where they powered a nvidia blackwell GPU and "hosted a website with it" (lol).
jjk166
This is an excellent example of how to communicate investigation findings. The summary is clear and succinct, there are illustrative examples readily understood by a layman, the recommendations are actionable and unambiguous, and the potential impact is quantified without promising some stupidly precise estimate. I've got some customers whose quality auditors could learn a lot from this.
freestanding
saving is always great!
Joel_Mckay
Sure, but has anyone ever built a container that lasts 30k years, and remains watertight? Thus far, most off-site containment storage sites over 10 years old have failed to stop containment leaks, Radon gas diffusion, or hot-material fires. Fission reactors are a 1950's loss-leader technology, and only make sense for already uninhabitable areas like space. =3
CircuitSeuss
Tangential: https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/07/nuclear-regulatory-c...
random__duck
Now this is a future 100 billion dollar industry!
calvinmorrison
nuclear clean up is a joke. The emissions from chinas coal burning plants is 10000000000000000000000000000000000000 times worse than chucking nuclear waste in the desert at random