Fuck Nuance (2015)
bariumbitmap
29 points
6 comments
October 25, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 125.9ms across 10,559 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- My experience has nuance, yours is a data point Brajeshwar · 59 pts · August 31, 2026 · 54% similar
- The value of not getting to the point (2015) NaOH · 144 pts · October 08, 2026 · 46% similar
- Attention Is Not What You Need (2025) westurner · 67 pts · October 25, 2026 · 40% similar
- HN: The Good Parts (2016) adletbalzhanov · 36 pts · August 21, 2026 · 39% similar
- Don't Be Nice edent · 84 pts · September 20, 2026 · 39% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
gnabgib
Discussion close the time (129 points, 68 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11370189
qurren
I like to think of nuances as nuisances. Sometimes I wonder if we can just merge these two words because they're pretty much the same thing most of the time.
spenrose
I still miss the original abstract: - Seriously, fuck it.
ConradKilroy
thank you for posting this!
acheron
You’d better look out, because I’m gonna say “fuck”. https://genius.com/Ben-folds-rockin-the-suburbs-lyrics
bariumbitmap
I don't know much about sociology, so I found it interesting to read a sociologist critique his own field. This part stood out to me: > To make a loose statistical analogy, it is a little like continuing to add variables to a regression on the grounds that the explained variance keeps increasing. Like a statistical model having parameters, a theory should have some nuance, but too much nuance is analogous to overfitting. It reminds me of the maxim that a theory should be as simple as possible but no simpler