FreeBSD ate my RAM
theanonymousone
105 points
41 comments
July 03, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 593.5ms across 14,015 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- FreeBSD – A Lesson in Poor Defaults jruohonen · 12 pts · May 10, 2026 · 58% similar
- FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation WhyNotHugo · 92 pts · May 21, 2026 · 57% similar
- CVE-2026-42511 Breakdown: RCE in FreeBSD mmsc · 14 pts · May 07, 2026 · 57% similar
- Why I love FreeBSD enz · 393 pts · March 16, 2026 · 55% similar
- Claude wrote a full FreeBSD remote kernel RCE with root shell ishqdehlvi · 258 pts · April 01, 2026 · 53% similar
Discussion Highlights (8 comments)
jmclnx
Interesting post, it made me wonder. At one time FreeBSD swap usage/logic was far better than what Linux did. Is that still the case ?
naturalmovement
ZFS cache. The end. User installs an unfamiliar server OS with an enterprise filesystem and is stunned when it works differently. I fail to see a teachable moment here.
m463
the end struck me - a picture of an os book. I wonder if students these days retain their books after college, or do they get returned as a rental?
duendefm
Thank you for such a quality post.
shevy-java
This is why I use Linux. :> Poor FreeBSD folks though. After so many years trying to present themselves as better alternative, the road just got steeper ...
tiffanyh
If you like this kind of post, you might like this “htop explained” post. https://peteris.rocks/blog/htop/
efxhoy
Great job on getting the fixes merged!
drdexebtjl
I don’t understand the part about using heuristics and deciding what counts as used memory… Used memory for the system is always total minus available. Heuristics? I would hope that the system knows precisely what is using every single byte of physical and virtual memory. Is this a reporting problem? Why do we have to settle for heuristics and not the exact number?