Flawless UI-UX Skill 1.0.0
99lcccss
27 points
31 comments
November 06, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 353.3ms across 11,878 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Graphical UI handfuloflight · 30 pts · October 05, 2026 · 51% similar
- OUI-1: world's first model for Generative UI zahlekhan · 60 pts · September 08, 2026 · 50% similar
- ElementaryUI – Swift, in the Browser frizlab · 86 pts · October 29, 2026 · 48% similar
- Freya 0.4 – Rust GUI library birdculture · 13 pts · July 18, 2026 · 48% similar
- Show HN: I left Figma to build a diffusion-based UI design tool jjcm · 18 pts · July 21, 2026 · 48% similar
Discussion Highlights (12 comments)
Fidelix
Any examples of the stuff this produces with a few distinct models?
OutThisLife
How are there no demos
swiftcoder
I love that this repo, of all repos, doesn't come with screenshots
demo4567
LMAO... Here is a bunch of stuff that you can get your agent to randomly do, like exfil data. Copy and go. Also, UI-UX but with not _UI_ _UX_ examples is insane
nfw2
UI is one thing, but agentic UX is actually really hard I've found.
ikety
Please provide examples (author of project) People come across so many things in a day you can't expect them to try this skill out without a demo or example to see first.
amelius
Sounds pretentious.
hbn
Every time I see someone post a skill on HN I'm really not sure what we're expected to be discussing about it. Are we supposed to go check out the markdown files that the author likely never read and comment on them? How are we supposed to know if these skills aren't up to quality with something I could make myself in a one-shot prompt? And with something as opinionated as design, how am I supposed to trust that this isn't filled with decisions I don't agree with?
kierenj
Despite almost all of the comments already saying it - I cannot fathom how something selling itself as producing flawless UI/UX.. does not demonstrate it in the README, or one click from it
reedlaw
Is there any evidence that skills like this beat training? For example, "Use links for navigation and buttons for actions", is something I imagine any decent model would have picked up already. From my experience, this kind of thing just bloats context and might cause the agent to go off on many rabit trails due to anchoring on keywords in the skill that aren't even relevant to the prompt.
jjcm
Examples comparing two similar de-slop skills. Flawless vs Impeccable vs Diffui (my own) for the same prompt[1]. Note that I did not prompt for mobile variants of these, so no clue how they'll show up on mobile. Flawless (4.4M tokens): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-flawless/ Impeccable (6.5M tokens): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-impeccable/ Diffui (2.4M tokens + $0.51 in api spend): https://html.non.io/skill-compare-diffui/ [1] Full prompt: Create three example webpage builds for the following prompt: "A landing page for a new foldable phone. Colorful dark green and gold theme. Should include a hero section, a build quality section emphasizing the waterproof capabilities, and a pricing section." Have three separate opus 5.5 cloud agents do this, each running in isolation. For the first use https://github.com/smokeeaasd/flawless-ui-ux For the second use https://impeccable.style For the third use https://diffui.ai
ricardobeat
1. why do you have to install an npm package just to download a text skill, when there are multiple tools available (eg. skill.sh) that already do that? 2. skills are worth nothing without proof that they improve outcomes - a website/app build with and without the skill should be an easy comparison to make