Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation (2014)
gmays
66 points
34 comments
September 05, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 174.5ms across 10,084 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Navier–Stokes Lost in Translation nill0 · 286 pts · October 07, 2026 · 56% similar
- Navier-Stokes – Tristan Buckmaster [pdf] procedurecall · 1496 pts · September 08, 2026 · 53% similar
- The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem tosh · 225 pts · September 09, 2026 · 52% similar
- Clay Mathematics Institute on the Navier-Stokes Problem rvz · 53 pts · September 12, 2026 · 51% similar
- On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem tedsanders · 1212 pts · September 08, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (6 comments)
goldenarm
@dang please can we add a [2014] to the title ?
tacomonstrous
This is essentially irrelevant to the content of the post, but it's amusing to me that he casually mentions submitting to JAMS as if its acceptance were a mere formality.
v64
This is going around due to rumors and baseless speculation on Twitter [1] right now that Anthropic has solved the Millennium problem related to Navier-Stokes [2] [1] https://x.com/AndrewCurran_/status/2096062392442724805 for example [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_existenc...
amelius
Interesting to see that they are not using the coordinate-free representation (exterior calculus, differential forms) that mathematical physicists prefer to use today.
immmmmm
It’s pretty crazy what dynamics you get from NS.. until one realise they emerge from a tiny part of the solution space of Einstein equations.. which themselves emerge at the low energy limit of sth much bigger.
MeteorMarc
See https://www.quantamagazine.org/theory-of-fluids-enters-the-2... if you want to know what the Navier Stokes equations are about.