FCC pays $340k/year to keep 100's of empty Alaska buildings wired for internet
Teever
35 points
15 comments
July 20, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 118.0ms across 5,564 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- FCC abolishes gigabit speed goal jonbaer · 33 pts · August 20, 2026 · 47% similar
- FCC abolishes gigabit speed goal, suggesting it is unfair to slower technologies toomuchtodo · 16 pts · August 19, 2026 · 46% similar
- Finland to Cut Cable Lines Carrying Up to 70% of Russia's Foreign Web Traffic donohoe · 12 pts · July 30, 2026 · 45% similar
- FCC to repeal 39% TV ownership cap in boost for Trump-friendly news orgs derbOac · 18 pts · July 15, 2026 · 42% similar
- FCC now requires satellite operators to share real-time location data marklit · 11 pts · August 12, 2026 · 41% similar
Discussion Highlights (5 comments)
pavel_lishin
This sounds like less of a "let's get mad at the FCC!" situation, but more of a "let's get mad at companies defrauding the US Government" situation.
RiverCrochet
Looks like they all use Starlink and no one uses the FCC-subsidized fiber. Starlink is nice, but I'd still want the option to switch to an alternate provider if Starlink suddenly raises their prices or otherwise becomes uncompetitive for some reason. I guess they do have cell service out there, though. I wonder how the copper PSTN is out there, or if it's totally replaced by that fiber.
exabrial
We should play whack-a-mole with fraud. We should ALSO reduce the federal budget to a trickle and return the money to where it belongs, the taxpayer.
nubinetwork
I'm a little confused about why there is an ongoing fee... unless someone didn't pay for the fibre pull upfront.
rootusrootus
As an interesting side note, this island gets a couple flights a week by an Alaska Airlines 737. That is impressive if the population is really down to a couple dozen. Edit: like the Internet access, the flights are heavily subsidized by the US taxpayer