Exploring Claude/GPT Knowledge Cutoffs and Pre-Training Timelines
sshh12
23 points
3 comments
August 10, 2026
Related Discussions
Found 5 related stories in 42.7ms across 4,128 title embeddings via pgvector HNSW
- Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6 tedsanders · 541 pts · July 30, 2026 · 56% similar
- GPT-5.6 used a prompt to close a 30-year gap in convex optimization mbustamanter · 540 pts · July 18, 2026 · 52% similar
- GPT-5.6 logickkk1 · 1171 pts · July 09, 2026 · 51% similar
- GPT‑Red: Unlocking Self-Improvement for Robustness alvis · 25 pts · July 15, 2026 · 51% similar
- GPT-5.6 vs. Claude Fable 5 for Physical AI, which performs best? mbauman · 90 pts · July 29, 2026 · 50% similar
Discussion Highlights (3 comments)
ddxv
This was great! One thing that wasn't addressed that I always assume, is that a marketing name like "Opus 5" is not a single model, but many models, versions and gets minor updates over time. I also assumed many questions get routed to simpler models or programs to answer correctly, but it almost surprisingly didn't seem that way from the post. Anyways, great post.
sashank_1509
So Jan 2026 latest, I guess we are due to 2 OOM’s better retraining over the coming years. Curious to see the point at which AI plateaus.
rad-b
Great read and interesting analysis! I’m less charitable toward Anthropic supposedly not distilling ChatGPT for training purposes. Maybe not today, but during the GPT-4 era when Anthropic was the underdog - I can see it happen. Packaged along with some of Amodei’s clever jumping through hoops to prove how that is, in fact, virtuous.